| Literature DB >> 18973271 |
Chris J L M Meijer1, Johannes Berkhof, Philip E Castle, Albertus T Hesselink, Eduardo L Franco, Guglielmo Ronco, Marc Arbyn, F Xavier Bosch, Jack Cuzick, Joakim Dillner, Daniëlle A M Heideman, Peter J F Snijders.
Abstract
Given the strong etiologic link between high-risk HPV infection and cervical cancer high-risk HPV testing is now being considered as an alternative for cytology-based cervical cancer screening. Many test systems have been developed that can detect the broad spectrum of hrHPV types in one assay. However, for screening purposes the detection of high-risk HPV is not inherently useful unless it is informative for the presence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) or cancer. Candidate high-risk HPV tests to be used for screening should reach an optimal balance between clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of high-grade CIN and cervical cancer to minimize redundant or excessive follow-up procedures for high-risk HPV positive women without cervical lesions. Data from various large screening studies have shown that high-risk HPV testing by hybrid capture 2 and GP5+/6+-PCR yields considerably better results in the detection of CIN 2/3 than cytology. The data from these studies can be used to guide the translation of high-risk HPV testing into clinical practice by setting standards of test performance and characteristics. On the basis of these data we have developed guidelines for high-risk HPV test requirements for primary cervical screening and validation guidelines for candidate HPV assays. Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 18973271 PMCID: PMC2789446 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cancer ISSN: 0020-7136 Impact factor: 7.396