Literature DB >> 17942872

Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer.

Pontus Naucler1, Walter Ryd, Sven Törnberg, Anders Strand, Göran Wadell, Kristina Elfgren, Thomas Rådberg, Björn Strander, Bo Johansson, Ola Forslund, Bengt-Göran Hansson, Eva Rylander, Joakim Dillner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening for cervical cancer based on testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) increases the sensitivity of detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, but whether this gain represents overdiagnosis or protection against future high-grade cervical epithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer is unknown.
METHODS: In a population-based screening program in Sweden, 12,527 women 32 to 38 years of age were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to have an HPV test plus a Papanicolaou (Pap) test (intervention group) or a Pap test alone (control group). Women with a positive HPV test and a normal Pap test result were offered a second HPV test at least 1 year later, and those who were found to be persistently infected with the same high-risk type of HPV were then offered colposcopy with cervical biopsy. A similar number of double-blinded Pap smears and colposcopies with biopsy were performed in randomly selected women in the control group. Comprehensive registry data were used to follow the women for a mean of 4.1 years. The relative rates of grade 2 or 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer detected at enrollment and at subsequent screening examinations were calculated.
RESULTS: At enrollment, the proportion of women in the intervention group who were found to have lesions of grade 2 or 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer was 51% greater (95% confidence interval [CI], 13 to 102) than the proportion of women in the control group who were found to have such lesions. At subsequent screening examinations, the proportion of women in the intervention group who were found to have grade 2 or 3 lesions or cancer was 42% less (95% CI, 4 to 64) and the proportion with grade 3 lesions or cancer was 47% less (95% CI, 2 to 71) than the proportions of control women who were found to have such lesions. Women with persistent HPV infection remained at high risk for grade 2 or 3 lesions or cancer after referral for colposcopy.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of an HPV test to the Pap test to screen women in their mid-30s for cervical cancer reduces the incidence of grade 2 or 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer detected by subsequent screening examinations. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00479375 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17942872     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa073204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  223 in total

1.  Longitudinal analysis of carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection and associated cytologic abnormalities in the Guanacaste natural history study: looking ahead to cotesting.

Authors:  Sarah Coseo Markt; Ana C Rodriguez; Robert D Burk; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero; Sholom Wacholder; Martha Hutchinson; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Characteristics of 44 cervical cancers diagnosed following Pap-negative, high risk HPV-positive screening in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Walter Kinney; Barbara Fetterman; J Thomas Cox; Thomas Lorey; Tracy Flanagan; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Gynecological cancer: More evidence supporting human papillomavirus testing.

Authors:  Philip E Castle
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Preventing cervical cancer globally by acting locally: if not now, when?

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Associations between oral HPV16 infection and cytopathology: evaluation of an oropharyngeal "pap-test equivalent" in high-risk populations.

Authors:  Carole Fakhry; Barbara T Rosenthal; Douglas P Clark; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-08-11

Review 6.  Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sholom Wacholder; Walter Kinney; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A population-based study of human papillomavirus genotype prevalence in the United States: baseline measures prior to mass human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  Cosette M Wheeler; William C Hunt; Jack Cuzick; Erika Langsfeld; Amanda Pearse; George D Montoya; Michael Robertson; Catherine A Shearman; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Methylation of HPV18, HPV31, and HPV45 genomes and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Chang Sun; Arpita Ghosh; Walter Kinney; Lisa Mirabello; Sholom Wacholder; Ruth Shaber; Brandon LaMere; Megan Clarke; Attila T Lorincz; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Robert D Burk
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Immunoprevention of human papillomavirus-associated malignancies.

Authors:  Joshua W Wang; Chein-Fu Hung; Warner K Huh; Cornelia L Trimble; Richard B S Roden
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-12-08

Review 10.  Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer prevention: results from European trials.

Authors:  Elsebeth Lynge; Matejka Rebolj
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.