Literature DB >> 17354241

Risk of high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia based on cytology and high-risk HPV testing at baseline and at 6-months.

Saskia Bulk1, Nicole W J Bulkmans, Johannes Berkhof, Lawrence Rozendaal, A Joan P Boeke, René H M Verheijen, Peter J F Snijders, Chris J L M Meijer.   

Abstract

Adding a test for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) to cytological screening enhances the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (>or=CIN2), but data are required that enable long-term evaluation of screening. We investigated the >or=CIN2 risk for women participating in population-based screening as a function of hrHPV and cytology testing results at baseline and at 6 months. We included 2,193 women aged 30-60 years participating in a population-based screening trial who received colposcopy or a repeat testing advice at baseline. The main endpoint was histologically confirmed >or=CIN2 diagnosed within 36 months. hrHPV testing was more sensitive than cytology for >or=CIN2 (relative sensitivity 1.4, 95%CI: 1.3-1.5; absolute sensitivity 94.1 and 68.0%, respectively). The 18-month >or=CIN2 risks in women with a hrHPV-positive smear and in women with abnormal cytology were similar (relative risk 0.9, 95%CI: 0.8-1.1). Women with HPV16 and/or HPV18 had a higher >or=CIN2 risk than other hrHPV-positive women irrespective of the cytological grade. Repeat testing showed that both cytological regression and viral clearance were strongly associated with a decrease in >or=CIN2 risk. Notably, women who had a double negative repeat test at 6 months had a >or=CIN2 risk of only 0.2% (95%CI: 0.0-1.1) and hrHPV-negative women with baseline borderline or mild dyskaryosis and normal cytology at 6 months had a >or=CIN2 risk of 0% (95%CI: 0.0-0.8). Using hrHPV and/or cytology testing, risk of >or=CIN2 can be assessed more accurately by repeat testing than single visit testing. Hence, when hrHPV testing is implemented, patient management with repeat testing is a promising strategy to control the number of referrals for colposcopy. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17354241     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  21 in total

Review 1.  Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sholom Wacholder; Walter Kinney; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  RNA-based high-risk HPV genotyping and identification of high-risk HPV transcriptional activity in cervical tissues.

Authors:  Corina N A M van den Heuvel; Diede L Loopik; Renée M F Ebisch; Duaa Elmelik; Karolina M Andralojc; Martijn Huynen; Johan Bulten; Ruud L M Bekkers; Leon F A G Massuger; Willem J G Melchers; Albert G Siebers; William P J Leenders
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Prognostic value of human papillomavirus 16/18 genotyping in low-grade cervical lesions preceded by mildly abnormal cytology.

Authors:  Jing Ye; Bei Cheng; Yi-Fan Cheng; Ye-Li Yao; Xing Xie; Wei-Guo Lu; Xiao-Dong Cheng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2017 Mar.       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  HPV testing on self collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: cohort study.

Authors:  Murat Gök; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Folkert J van Kemenade; Johannes Berkhof; Lawrence Rozendaal; Johan W M Spruyt; Feja Voorhorst; Jeroen A M Beliën; Milena Babovic; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-11

5.  Comparison of clinical performance of Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test with that of hybrid capture 2 assay in a screening setting.

Authors:  F M Carozzi; E Burroni; S Bisanzi; D Puliti; M Confortini; P Giorgi Rossi; C Sani; A Scalisi; F Chini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of Hybrid capture 2 testing at different thresholds with cytology as primary cervical screening test.

Authors:  D C Rijkaart; V M H Coupe; F J van Kemenade; D A M Heideman; A T Hesselink; W Verweij; L Rozendaal; R H Verheijen; P J Snijders; J Berkhof; C J L M Meijer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Patterns of persistent genital human papillomavirus infection among women worldwide: a literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anne F Rositch; Jill Koshiol; Michael G Hudgens; Hilda Razzaghi; Danielle M Backes; Jeanne M Pimenta; Eduardo L Franco; Charles Poole; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Comparison of GP5+/6+-PCR and SPF10-line blot assays for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in samples from women with normal cytology results who develop grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  A T Hesselink; M A P C van Ham; D A M Heideman; Z M A Groothuismink; L Rozendaal; J Berkhof; F J van Kemenade; L A F G Massuger; W J G Melchers; C J L M Meijer; P J F Snijders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for primary cervical cancer screening in women 30 years and older.

Authors:  Chris J L M Meijer; Johannes Berkhof; Philip E Castle; Albertus T Hesselink; Eduardo L Franco; Guglielmo Ronco; Marc Arbyn; F Xavier Bosch; Jack Cuzick; Joakim Dillner; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Peter J F Snijders
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Clinical evaluation of a GP5+/6+-based luminex assay having full high-risk human papillomavirus genotyping capability and an internal control.

Authors:  D T Geraets; K Cuschieri; M N C de Koning; L J van Doorn; P J F Snijders; C J L M Meijer; W G V Quint; M Arbyn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.