Literature DB >> 14634510

A comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patients with nipple discharge.

Hiroshi Nakahara1, Kiyoshi Namba, Ryoji Watanabe, Hidemi Furusawa, Takafumi Matsu, Futoshi Akiyama, Goi Sakamoto, Shozo Tamura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, compared with galactography and ultrasonography(US).
METHODS: Fifty-five patients with bloody nipple discharge were investigated retrospectively. All patients were examined by galactography, ultrasonography and MR imaging. These three sets of findings were compared with the histopathological results from 16 intraductal biopsies, 3 excisional biopsies, 24 microdochectomies and 12 mastectomies.
RESULTS: Contrast enhanced MR imaging demonstrated all malignant lesions including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Four cases of DCIS were not visualized by ultrasonography and three malignant lesions were missed by galactography. In the MR study, segmental clumped enhancement (positive predictive value =100 %), and focal mass with smooth border (negative predictive value =87.5 %) were the statistically significant predictive factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the three modalities, contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR imaging demonstrated the location and distribution of the lesions most clearly, especially in cases of ductal carcinoma in situ. It has the potential to be a useful diagnostic tool for patients with nipple discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14634510     DOI: 10.1007/bf02967652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  8 in total

1.  Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; G M Giuseppetti; G Canavese; L Cataliotti; S Corcione; E Cossu; M Federico; L Marotti; L Martincich; P Panizza; F Podo; M Rosselli Del Turco; C Zuiani; C Alfano; M Bazzocchi; P Belli; S Bianchi; A Cilotti; M Calabrese; L Carbonaro; L Cortesi; C Di Maggio; A Del Maschio; A Esseridou; A Fausto; M Gennaro; R Girometti; R Ienzi; A Luini; S Manoukian; S Morassutt; D Morrone; J Nori; A Orlacchio; F Pane; P Panzarola; R Ponzone; G Simonetti; P Torricelli; G Valeri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with unilateral bloody nipple discharge; useful when conventional diagnostics are negative?

Authors:  L van Gelder; R H C Bisschops; M B E Menke-Pluymers; P J Westenend; P W Plaisier
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Comparison of ductoscopy, galactography, and imaging modalities for the evaluation of intraductal lesions: a critical review.

Authors:  Ozgur Sarica; Enis Ozturk; Huseyin C Demirkurek; Fatih Uluc
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge: indications and imaging findings.

Authors:  Naziya Samreen; Laura B Madsen; Celin Chacko; Samantha L Heller
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Ductographic findings of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; Sun Yang Chung; Joo Hee Cha; Kyung Soo Cho; Eun Kyung Kim; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Reliability of Breast Ultrasound BI-RADS Final Assessment in Mammographically Negative Patients with Nipple Discharge and Radiologic Predictors of Malignancy.

Authors:  Chae Jung Park; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  Diagnosis of Nipple Discharge: Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Comparison with Ductoscopy.

Authors:  Ravza Yılmaz; Ömer Bender; Fatma Çelik Yabul; Menduh Dursun; Mehtap Tunacı; Gülden Acunas
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.021

8.  Persistent post-galactogram intraductal iodinated contrast detected on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in a patient with nipple discharge.

Authors:  Shao Zun Chen; Timothy B Rooney; Matthew M Miller
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.