Literature DB >> 16301189

What is the role of DXA, QUS and bone markers in fracture prediction, treatment allocation and monitoring?

Karine Briot1, Christian Roux.   

Abstract

There is evidence that treatment can decrease the risk of fractures in osteoporotic patients, and screening of these patients is therefore relevant. Diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on the T-score calculated from bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. BMD measurements have been widely used for the management of osteoporosis, and a low BMD is a strong risk factor for fractures. But BMD measurement has several limitations in both diagnosis, prediction of fracture risk, and treatment follow-up. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters, an alternative to BMD in the assessment of bone, are independent risk factors for osteoporotic fracture. However, the use of QUS cannot be recommended for both allocation and monitoring of treatment. Biochemical markers of bone remodelling can be useful for both prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of treatment if sources of variability are controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16301189     DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1521-6942            Impact factor:   4.098


  7 in total

1.  [Antiosteoporosis medication: useful monitoring, and how long should such treatment be continued?].

Authors:  W Demary
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 2.  Clinical opinion: the biologic and pharmacologic principles for age-adjusted long-term estrogen therapy.

Authors:  Morris Notelovitz
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-03-28

Review 3.  Advances in imaging approaches to fracture risk evaluation.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.012

4.  Performance of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the discrimination of prevalent asymptomatic osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  A El Maghraoui; F Morjane; A Mounach; M Ghazi; A Nouijai; L Achemlal; A Bezza; I Ghozlani
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Influence of polymorphisms in the RANKL/RANK/OPG signaling pathway on volumetric bone mineral density and bone geometry at the forearm in men.

Authors:  Delnaz Roshandel; Kate L Holliday; Stephen R Pye; Kate A Ward; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren; Herman Borghs; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi; Judith E Adams; Gyorgy Bartfai; Felipe F Casanueva; Joseph D Finn; Gianni Forti; Aleksander Giwercman; Thang S Han; Krzysztof Kula; Michael E Lean; Neil Pendleton; Margus Punab; Alan J Silman; Frederick C Wu; Wendy Thomson; Terence W ONeill
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Biochemical markers for assessment of calcium economy and bone metabolism: application in clinical trials from pharmaceutical agents to nutritional products.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Bonjour; Wendy Kohrt; Régis Levasseur; Michelle Warren; Susan Whiting; Marius Kraenzlin
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 7.800

Review 7.  Optimizing dosing frequencies for bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient considerations.

Authors:  John Sunyecz
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.