Literature DB >> 16758133

Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture.

R D Chapurlat1, F Duboeuf, H O Marion-Audibert, B Kalpakçioglu, B H Mitlak, P D Delmas.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fracture is currently underdiagnosed, despite its common severity and its value to predict further osteoporotic fracture. Morphometry using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) [vertebral fracture assessment (VFA)] is a new technique that may facilitate detection of many vertebral fractures, as images are obtained at the same time as bone mineral density (BMD) measurement, and would also allow avoiding spine radiographs.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the diagnostic value of Instant Vertebral Assessment (IVA), which is a morphometry scan using the Hologic Delphi densitometer, to detect prevalent vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. Interobserver precision was assessed, then IVA scans were compared with lateral spine radiographs, considered the gold standard, to test diagnostic agreement between the two techniques. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated, as well as the likelihood ratio of the positive test, using sensitivity and specificity at each vertebral level.
RESULTS: Among 85 patients of whom 50% had at least one vertebral fracture identified with radiographs, we found that interobserver precision was moderate, with frequent difficulties in discerning upper thoracic vertebrae. On a per-vertebra basis, sensitivity was around 70% from L4 to T11 and lower above T11 whereas specificity was above 90% for all vertebrae, and the negative predictive value remained above 80% from L4 to T7 and decreased above T7. On a per-patient basis, sensitivity was 0.69, specificity 0.74, positive predictive value equalled 0.72 and negative predictive value 0.71. When only grades 2 and 3 fractures were considered, results were comparable, with slightly improved specificity. Then, with the likelihood ratios calculated in our sample, we obtained posttest probabilities using the prevalence of vertebral fracture at lumbar and thoracic levels in a large sample of postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis with and without vertebral fracture [baseline data in women of the Multiple Outcomes on Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial]. At levels where fractures were most common, likelihood ratios of the positive test were good or excellent, associated with sizeable posttest probabilities.
CONCLUSION: IVA allowed diagnosis of vertebral fracture at levels where vertebral fracture were most common, i.e., the lumbar and mid and lower thoracic levels, but its value was weaker at the upper thoracic levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16758133     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0121-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  13 in total

1.  Classification of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  R Eastell; S L Cedel; H W Wahner; B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study.

Authors:  M C Nevitt; B Ettinger; D M Black; K Stone; S A Jamal; K Ensrud; M Segal; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study.

Authors:  J R Center; T V Nguyen; D Schneider; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Pierre D Delmas; Lex van de Langerijt; Nelson B Watts; Richard Eastell; Harry Genant; Andreas Grauer; David L Cahall
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Identification of vertebral deformities in women: comparison of radiological assessment and quantitative morphometry using morphometric radiography and morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Ferrar; G Jiang; N A Barrington; R Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture.

Authors:  R Lindsay; S L Silverman; C Cooper; D A Hanley; I Barton; S B Broy; A Licata; L Benhamou; P Geusens; K Flowers; H Stracke; E Seeman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Visual identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis using morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Ferrar; G Jiang; R Eastell; N F A Peel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; T D Spector; K S Eyres; E D Fern; N O'Rourke; S Vasikaran; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  34 in total

1.  QCT measures of bone strength at the thoracic and lumbar spine: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Blaine A Christiansen; Serkalem Demissie; Kerry E Broe; Qiong Louie-Gao; L Adrienne Cupples; Benjamin J Roberts; Rajaram Manoharam; John D'Agostino; Thomas Lang; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Diagnosis of vertebral fractures using a low-dose biplanar imaging system.

Authors:  K Briot; J Fechtenbaum; A Etcheto; S Kolta; A Feydy; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Identification of vertebral fractures: a moderately severe solution?

Authors:  E V McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Association between incident and baseline vertebral fractures in European women: vertebral fracture assessment in the Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study (OPUS).

Authors:  L Ferrar; C Roux; D Felsenberg; C-C Glüer; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures using CT lateral scout views: a comparison of semi-automated quantitative vertebral morphometry and radiologist semi-quantitative grading.

Authors:  Y M Kim; S Demissie; H K Genant; X Cheng; W Yu; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Observer agreement in pediatric semiquantitative vertebral fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  Kerry Siminoski; Brian Lentle; Mary Ann Matzinger; Nazih Shenouda; Leanne M Ward
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-10

7.  Simplified criteria for selecting patients for vertebral fracture assessment.

Authors:  Sharon H Chou; Tamara J Vokes; Siu-Ling Ma; Maureen Costello; Harold R Rosen; John T Schousboe
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Performance of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the discrimination of prevalent asymptomatic osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  A El Maghraoui; F Morjane; A Mounach; M Ghazi; A Nouijai; L Achemlal; A Bezza; I Ghozlani
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  Bone mineral density: testing for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Angela Sheu; Terry Diamond
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2016-04-01

10.  Evaluation of vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter setting.

Authors:  T Fuerst; C Wu; H K Genant; G von Ingersleben; Y Chen; C Johnston; M J Econs; N Binkley; T J Vokes; G Crans; B H Mitlak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.