Literature DB >> 18952071

Corticolimbic mechanisms in the control of trial and error learning.

Phan Luu1, Matthew Shane, Nikki L Pratt, Don M Tucker.   

Abstract

As learning progresses, human and animal studies suggest that a frontal executive system is strongly involved early in learning, whereas a posterior monitoring and control system comes online as learning progresses. In a previous study, we employed dense array EEG methodology to delineate the involvement of these two systems as human participants learn, through trial and error, to associate manual responses with arbitrary digit codes. The results were generally consistent with the dual-system learning model, pointing to the importance of both systems as learning progressed. In the present study, we replicate and extend the previous findings by examining the brain responses to error trials as well as examine the activity of these two systems' response to feedback processing. The results confirmed the role of these two systems in learning but they also provide a more complex view of their makeup and function. The frontal system includes ventral (inferior frontal gyrus, ventral anterior cingulate cortex, anterior temporal lobe) corticolimbic structures that are involved early in learning whereas the posterior system includes dorsal (anterior and posterior cingulate and medial temporal lobe) corticolimbic circuits that are engaged later in learning. Importantly, the engagement of each system during the course of learning is dependent on the nature of the events within the learning task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18952071      PMCID: PMC2650437          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  40 in total

Review 1.  Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions.

Authors:  S P Wise; E A Murray
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task.

Authors:  V Menon; N E Adleman; C D White; G H Glover; A L Reiss
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulation.

Authors:  Phan Luu; Don M Tucker; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints.

Authors:  Rolando Grave de Peralta Menendez; Micah M Murray; Christoph M Michel; Roberto Martuzzi; Sara L Gonzalez Andino
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update.

Authors:  Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  David Badre; Russell A Poldrack; E Juliana Paré-Blagoev; Rachel Z Insler; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection.

Authors:  Leah H Somerville; Todd F Heatherton; William M Kelley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-02       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Electrophysiological analysis of expectancy: P3 in informed guessing.

Authors:  B Kotchoubey; B Grözinger; A W Kornhuber; H H Kornhuber
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.292

9.  Estimation of in vivo brain-to-skull conductivity ratio in humans.

Authors:  Yingchun Zhang; Wim van Drongelen; Bin He
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Error monitoring using external feedback: specific roles of the habenular complex, the reward system, and the cingulate motor area revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Markus Ullsperger; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  13 in total

1.  Brain oscillatory activity associated with task switching and feedback processing.

Authors:  Toni Cunillera; Lluís Fuentemilla; Jose Periañez; Josep Marco-Pallarès; Ulrike M Krämer; Estela Càmara; Thomas F Münte; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support.

Authors:  Elena Núñez Castellar; Simone Kühn; Wim Fias; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Social exclusion in middle childhood: rejection events, slow-wave neural activity, and ostracism distress.

Authors:  Michael J Crowley; Jia Wu; Peter J Molfese; Linda C Mayes
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  The temporal dynamic of response inhibition in early childhood: an ERP study of partial and successful inhibition.

Authors:  Nicolas Chevalier; Kathleen M Kelsey; Sandra A Wiebe; Kimberly Andrews Espy
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  A developmental study of the feedback-related negativity from 10-17 years: age and sex effects for reward versus non-reward.

Authors:  Michael J Crowley; Jia Wu; Rebecca E Hommer; Mikle South; Peter J Molfese; R M P Fearon; Linda C Mayes
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Reentrant processing in intuitive perception.

Authors:  Phan Luu; Alexandra Geyer; Cali Fidopiastis; Gwendolyn Campbell; Tracey Wheeler; Joseph Cohn; Don M Tucker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  All about the Money - External Performance Monitoring is Affected by Monetary, but Not by Socially Conveyed Feedback Cues in More Antisocial Individuals.

Authors:  Daniela Melitta Pfabigan; Johanna Alexopoulos; Herbert Bauer; Claus Lamm; Uta Sailer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Learning and the development of contexts for action.

Authors:  Phan Luu; Zhongqing Jiang; Catherine Poulsen; Chelsea Mattson; Anne Smith; Don M Tucker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore: the illusion of money and the rapid encoding of its true value.

Authors:  Rongjun Yu; Yi Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.