Literature DB >> 14980555

Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints.

Rolando Grave de Peralta Menendez1, Micah M Murray, Christoph M Michel, Roberto Martuzzi, Sara L Gonzalez Andino.   

Abstract

This paper proposes and implements biophysical constraints to select a unique solution to the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem. It first shows that the brain's electric fields and potentials are predominantly due to ohmic currents. This serves to reformulate the inverse problem in terms of a restricted source model permitting noninvasive estimations of Local Field Potentials (LFPs) in depth from scalp-recorded data. Uniqueness in the solution is achieved by a physically derived regularization strategy that imposes a spatial structure on the solution based upon the physical laws that describe electromagnetic fields in biological media. The regularization strategy and the source model emulate the properties of brain activity's actual generators. This added information is independent of both the recorded data and head model and suffices for obtaining a unique solution compatible with and aimed at analyzing experimental data. The inverse solution's features are evaluated with event-related potentials (ERPs) from a healthy subject performing a visuo-motor task. Two aspects are addressed: the concordance between available neurophysiological evidence and inverse solution results, and the functional localization provided by fMRI data from the same subject under identical experimental conditions. The localization results are spatially and temporally concordant with experimental evidence, and the areas detected as functionally activated in both imaging modalities are similar, providing indices of localization accuracy. We conclude that biophysically driven inverse solutions offer a novel and reliable possibility for studying brain function with the temporal resolution required to advance our understanding of the brain's functional networks.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14980555     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  100 in total

1.  Increasing the accuracy of electromagnetic inverses using functional area source correlation constraints.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Setting boundaries: brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Deirdre M Foxe; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Enhanced efficiency of the executive attention network after training in preschool children: immediate changes and effects after two months.

Authors:  M Rosario Rueda; Puri Checa; Lina M Cómbita
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.464

4.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Juliane Britz; Michael A Pitts; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Mental imagery of self-location during spontaneous and active self-other interactions: an electrical neuroimaging study.

Authors:  Bérangère Thirioux; Manuel R Mercier; Gérard Jorland; Alain Berthoz; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes.

Authors:  Beatriz R Sarmiento; Pawel J Matusz; Daniel Sanabria; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Looming signals reveal synergistic principles of multisensory integration.

Authors:  Céline Cappe; Antonia Thelen; Vincenzo Romei; Gregor Thut; Micah M Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Actual and mental motor preparation and execution: a spatiotemporal ERP study.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Marie-Pierre Deiber; Carine Andrey; Christoph M Michel; Gregor Thut; Claude-Alain Hauert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A developmental study of the feedback-related negativity from 10-17 years: age and sex effects for reward versus non-reward.

Authors:  Michael J Crowley; Jia Wu; Rebecca E Hommer; Mikle South; Peter J Molfese; R M P Fearon; Linda C Mayes
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Corticolimbic mechanisms in the control of trial and error learning.

Authors:  Phan Luu; Matthew Shane; Nikki L Pratt; Don M Tucker
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.