Literature DB >> 20221589

A visual distracter task during adaptation reduces the proprioceptive movement aftereffect.

Tatjana Seizova-Cajic1, Rita Azzi.   

Abstract

Visual processing of basic perceptual attributes depends on attention. This has been well documented since the surprising initial report on attentional modulation of the visual motion aftereffect (Chaudhuri 1990). Here, we investigate proprioception and show for the first time that attention modulates adaptation to perceived limb movement. We used biceps vibration to induce illusory forearm extension in 10 participants and measured the aftereffect-perceived movement in the opposite direction. The aftereffect was largest when participants focused on the illusory extension during the adaptation period. To divert attention away from the illusory extension, a rapid serial visual presentation task was performed during the adaptation. The aftereffect was much smaller in this condition, indicating interference between the visual task and proprioceptive adaptation. In tests of an analogous interaction between audition and vision, earlier research found no effect. We suggest that conscious proprioception requires more attention than conscious processing of visual or auditory input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20221589     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2204-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Attentional modulation of visual motion perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Attention makes moving objects be perceived to move faster.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Massimo Vescovi; Matteo Valsecchi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Sensory processing during kinesthetic aftereffect following illusory hand movement elicited by tendon vibration.

Authors:  Tomonori Kito; Toshihiro Hashimoto; Tsugutake Yoneda; Shizuo Katamoto; Eiichi Naito
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration during isometric contraction.

Authors:  D Burke; K E Hagbarth; L Löfstedt; B G Wallin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion.

Authors:  M J Lankheet; F A Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Muscle spindle activity following muscle tendon vibration in man.

Authors:  E Ribot-Ciscar; C Rossi-Durand; J P Roll
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1998-12-24       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  [Perceptive and motor effects of muscular vibrations in the normal human: demonstration of a response by opposing muscles].

Authors:  J P Roll; J C Gilhodes; M F Tardy-Gervet
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: brain mechanisms of attention.

Authors:  John Duncan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Proprioceptive movement illusions due to prolonged stimulation: reversals and aftereffects.

Authors:  Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Janette L Smith; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Conflict with vision diminishes proprioceptive adaptation to muscle vibration.

Authors:  Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Rita Azzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Boosting and consolidating the proprioceptive cortical aftereffect by combining tendon vibration and repetitive TMS over primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Luisa Perasso; Laura Avanzino; Giovanna Lagravinese; Alessandro Giannini; Emanuela Luisa Faelli; Ambra Bisio; Angelo Quartarone; Vincenzo Rizzo; Piero Ruggeri; Marco Bove
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Visual feedback from a virtual body modulates motor illusion induced by tendon vibration.

Authors:  Gabriele Fusco; Gaetano Tieri; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-10

4.  Illusory movements induced by tendon vibration in right- and left-handed people.

Authors:  Emmanuele Tidoni; Gabriele Fusco; Daniele Leonardis; Antonio Frisoli; Massimo Bergamasco; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effect of task-related continuous auditory feedback during learning of tracking motion exercises.

Authors:  Giulio Rosati; Fabio Oscari; Simone Spagnol; Federico Avanzini; Stefano Masiero
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.