Literature DB >> 15610746

The motion aftereffect of transparent motion: two temporal channels account for perceived direction.

David Alais1, Frans A J Verstraten, David C Burr.   

Abstract

Adaptation to orthogonal transparent patterns drifting at the same speed produces a unidirectional motion aftereffect (MAE) whose direction is opposite the average adaptation direction. If the patterns move at different speeds, MAE direction can be predicted by an inverse vector average, using the observer's motion sensitivity to each individual pattern as vector magnitudes. These weights are well approximated by the duration of each pattern's MAE, as measured with static test patterns. However, previous efforts to use the inverse-vector-average rule with dynamic test patterns have failed. Generally, these studies have used spatially and temporally broadband test stimuli. Here, in order to gain insight into the possible contribution of temporal channels, we filtered our test pattern in the temporal domain to produce five ideal, octave-width pass-bands. MAE durations were measured for single-component stimuli drifting at various adaptation speeds and tested at a range of temporal frequencies. Then, two components with orthogonal directions and different speeds were combined and the direction of the resulting MAE was measured. The key findings are that: (i) for a given adaptation speed, the duration of a single component's MAE is dependent on test temporal frequency; (ii) the direction of MAEs produced by transparent motion (i.e., bivectorial adaptation) also varies strongly as a function test temporal frequency (by up to 90 degrees for some speed pairings); and (iii) the inverse-vector-average rule predicts the direction of the transparent MAE provided the MAE durations used to weight the vector combination were obtained from stimuli matched in adaptation speed and test temporal frequency. These results are discussed in terms of the number and shape of temporal channels in our visual system.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15610746     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Motion-form interactions beyond the motion integration level: evidence for interactions between orientation and optic flow signals.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti; George Mather
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Neural population representation hypothesis of visual flow and its illusory after effect in the brain: psychophysics, neurophysiology and computational approaches.

Authors:  Hide-Aki Saito; Eiki Hida; Shun-Ichi Amari; Hiroshi Ohno; Naoki Hashimoto
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 3.  The motion aftereffect reloaded.

Authors:  George Mather; Andrea Pavan; Gianluca Campana; Clara Casco
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Temporal whitening: transient noise perceptually equalizes the 1/f temporal amplitude spectrum.

Authors:  John Cass; David Alais; Branka Spehar; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A motion-energy model predicts the direction discrimination and MAE duration of two-stroke apparent motion at high and low retinal illuminance.

Authors:  Kirsten L Challinor; George Mather
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Interactions between motion and form processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  George Mather; Andrea Pavan; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti; Gianluca Campana; Clara Casco
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  The role of the harmonic vector average in motion integration.

Authors:  Alan Johnston; Peter Scarfe
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Serial dependence and center bias in heading perception from optic flow.

Authors:  Qi Sun; Huihui Zhang; David Alais; Li Li
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.