Literature DB >> 18949561

The role of native-language phonology in the auditory word identification and visual word recognition of Russian-English bilinguals.

Valeriy Shafiro1, Anatoliy V Kharkhurin.   

Abstract

Does native language phonology influence visual word processing in a second language? This question was investigated in two experiments with two groups of Russian-English bilinguals, differing in their English experience, and a monolingual English control group. Experiment 1 tested visual word recognition following semantic categorization of words containing four phonological vowel contrasts (/i/-/u/,/I/-/A/,/i/-/I/,/epsilon/-/ae/). Experiment 2 assessed auditory identification accuracy of words containing these four contrasts. Both bilingual groups demonstrated reduced accuracy in auditory identification of two English vowel contrasts absent in their native phonology (/i/-/I/,epsilon/-/ae/). For late- bilinguals, auditory identification difficulty was accompanied by poor visual word recognition for one difficult contrast (/i/-/I/). Bilinguals' visual word recognition moderately correlated with their auditory identification of difficult contrasts. These results indicate that native language phonology can play a role in visual processing of second language words. However, this effect may be considerably constrained by orthographic systems of specific languages.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18949561     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-008-9086-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  9 in total

1.  Vowel duration affects visual word identification: evidence that the mediating phonology is phonetically informed.

Authors:  Georgije Lukatela; Thomas Eaton; Laura Sabadini; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: the roles of competition and bias.

Authors:  S D Goldinger; P A Luce; D B Pisoni; J K Marcario
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: phonetic context effects.

Authors:  Winifred Strange; Andrea Weber; Erika S Levy; Valeriy Shafiro; Miwako Hisagi; Kanae Nishi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The activation of phonological representations by bilinguals while reading silently: evidence from interlingual homophones.

Authors:  Corinne A Haigh; Debra Jared
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Phonological access of the lexicon: evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition.

Authors:  M F Lesch; A Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception.

Authors:  J E Flege; M J Munro; R A Fox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues that differentiate /r/ and /l/.

Authors:  L Polka; W Strange
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin speakers: age-related differences vary with amount of L2 exposure.

Authors:  Gisela Jia; Winifred Strange; Julissa Collado; Qi Guan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.