Literature DB >> 14769074

Vowel duration affects visual word identification: evidence that the mediating phonology is phonetically informed.

Georgije Lukatela1, Thomas Eaton, Laura Sabadini, M T Turvey.   

Abstract

What form is the lexical phonology that gives rise to phonological effects in visual lexical decision? The authors explored the hypothesis that beyond phonological contrasts the physical phonetic details of words are included. Three experiments using lexical decision and 1 using naming compared processing times for printed words (e.g., plead and pleat) that differ, when spoken, in vowel length and overall duration. Latencies were longer for long-vowel words than for short-vowel words in lexical decision but not in naming. Further, lexical decision on long-vowel words benefited more from identity priming than lexical decision on short-vowel words, suggesting that representations of long-vowel words achieve activation thresholds more slowly. The discussion focused on phonetically informed phonologies, particularly gestural phonology and its potential for understanding reading acquisition and performance. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14769074     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Do phonological constraints on the spoken word affect visual lexical decision?

Authors:  Yang Lee; Miguel A Moreno; Claudia Carello; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-04

2.  Syllabic tone articulation influences the identification and use of words during Chinese sentence reading: Evidence from ERP and eye movement recordings.

Authors:  Yingyi Luo; Ming Yan; Shaorong Yan; Xiaolin Zhou; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Phonological assimilation and visual word recognition.

Authors:  Yang Lee; Miguel A Moreno; Hyeongsaeng Park; Claudia Carello; Michael T Turvey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-11

5.  The Basis of the Syllable Hierarchy: Articulatory Pressures or Universal Phonological Constraints?

Authors:  Xu Zhao; Iris Berent
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-02

6.  The role of native-language phonology in the auditory word identification and visual word recognition of Russian-English bilinguals.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Anatoliy V Kharkhurin
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-10-24

7.  Skilled readers begin processing sub-phonemic features by 80 ms during visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Lisa D Sanders; John Kingston
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  During visual word recognition, phonology is accessed within 100 ms and may be mediated by a speech production code: evidence from magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Katherine L Wheat; Piers L Cornelissen; Stephen J Frost; Peter C Hansen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Functional brain activation differences in school-age children with speech sound errors: speech and print processing.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Susan Felsenfeld; Stephen J Frost; W Einar Mencl; Robert K Fulbright; Elena L Grigorenko; Nicole Landi; Ayumi Seki; Kenneth R Pugh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Visual word recognition is accompanied by covert articulation: evidence for a speech-like phonological representation.

Authors:  Brianna M Eiter; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.