Literature DB >> 18941163

Screening mammography: does ethnicity influence patient preferences for higher recall rates given the potential for earlier detection of breast cancer?

Nazia F Jafri1, Rama S Ayyala, Al Ozonoff, Jacqueline Jordan-Gray, Priscilla J Slanetz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively survey the preferences of an underserved and predominantly minority population of women regarding their understanding of screening mammography, desire for recall and early detection, and willingness to continue with annual screening mammography once given a false-positive result.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1011 women who were going to undergo mammography completed a HIPAA-compliant, Institutional Review Board-approved, validated survey in one of three languages: English, Spanish, or Haitian-Creole. Data were analyzed across three groups (ie, white, black, Hispanic) by using chi(2) analysis.
RESULTS: Of 911 women included in the final analysis, 378 (41%) were white, 439 (48%) were black, and 94 (10%) were Hispanic. Income and education levels varied significantly across ethnicities (P < .0001). A higher percentage of white women (40%) correctly identified the sensitivity of mammography (P < .0001), while black (42%) and Hispanic (50%) participants thought mammography to have a higher sensitivity than it truly does. After a false-positive result, only 80% of black women and 71% of Hispanic women were likely to continue with screening in the future, compared with 93% of white women (P < .0001). Only 54% of black women and 59% of Hispanic women were willing to return for a second noninvasive procedure despite the possibility of a higher cancer detection rate, compared with 76% of white women (P < .0001). Black women (53%) were also more reluctant to be recalled for invasive studies, and Hispanic women (65%) were slightly less willing to take this risk than were white women (75%) (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Differences in ethnic background appear to influence women's understanding of mammography, compliance with recall, and preference for early detection of breast cancer. RSNA, 2008

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18941163     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493072176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women.

Authors:  Alecia Malin Fair; Debra Wujcik; Jin-Mann Sally Lin; Wei Zheng; Kathleen M Egan; Ana M Grau; Victoria L Champion; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

2.  Investigation of x-ray spectra for iodinated contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Stephen J Glick; Andrey Makeev
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-26

3.  Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography?

Authors:  Julie M Kapp; Rod Walker; Sebastien Haneuse; Diana S M Buist; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  A prospective assessment of racial/ethnic differences in future mammography behavior among women who had early mammography.

Authors:  Julie M Kapp; Rod Walker; Sebastien Haneuse; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Factors Associated with False Positive Results on Screening Mammography in a Population of Predominantly Hispanic Women.

Authors:  Julia E McGuinness; William Ueng; Meghna S Trivedi; Hae Seung Yi; Raven David; Alejandro Vanegas; Jennifer Vargas; Rossy Sandoval; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  The Challenges of Screening Mammography in Racial/Ethnic Minority Populations in the United States: A mini-review and observations from a predominantly Hispanic community.

Authors:  Julia E McGuinness; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  J Cancer Treatment Diagn       Date:  2018-04-05

7.  Mammographic screening in Sami speaking municipalities and a control group. Are early outcome measures influenced by ethnicity?

Authors:  Jan Norum; Solveig Hofvind; Carsten Nieder; Edrun Andrea Schnell; Ann Ragnhild Broderstad
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.228

8.  Demographic factors influencing consensus opinion on the recall for women screened by mobile mammography unit in taiwan.

Authors:  Lee Yu-Mei; Yao Hsueh-Hua
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 0.212

9.  Outcomes by Race in Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Nila Alsheik; Linda Blount; Qiu Qiong; Melinda Talley; Scott Pohlman; Kathleen Troeger; Genevieve Abbey; Victoria L Mango; Erica Pollack; Alice Chong; Greg Donadio; Michael Behling; Kathleen Mortimer; Emily Conant
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 6.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.