Literature DB >> 18936929

The coordination of upper and lower arm rotation.

Ali Alazmani1, Peter Culmer, Martin Levesley, Mark Mon-Williams, Bipin Bhakta.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that the upper and lower arm act as a coordinative structure coupled through a higher order control system. Five healthy participants moved their hand between two targets in ten conditions via internal/external rotation of the shoulder. In eight conditions, the task required concurrent rotation of the lower arm (180 degrees pronation/supination). Movements were stereotypical within a condition but plotting the upper and lower arm angle against each other produced an asymmetrical pattern. With internal rotation, the upper arm reached peak angular velocity slower than the lower arm but this was reversed with external rotation. In two conditions, participants were asked to move faster and slower than their normal speed. The peak speed, time to peak speed and duration were predictable for the different tasks. Internal and external asymmetries decreased with faster movements. In addition a decrease in upper arm amplitude (from 90 degrees to 30 degrees) removed the asymmetry. The asymmetry was unaffected by initial posture but was exaggerated when external rotation was paired with pronation rather than supination, and internal rotation combined with supination (versus pronation). However, the presence of the same fundamental pattern suggests that the asymmetry is not due to biomechanical factors but might arise because of the difficulties involved in visually monitoring the hand when it is close to the body. The results support the idea that functional coupling can occur between upper and lower arm rotations and thus provides further evidence for a higher order control system which is responsible for coordination of arm segment movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18936929     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1577-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  9 in total

1.  Kinematic rules for upper and lower arm contributions to grasp orientation.

Authors:  J J Marotta; W P Medendorp; J D Crawford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The effect of orientation on prehension movement time.

Authors:  Elsje van Bergen; Lisa M van Swieten; Justin H G Williams; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers.

Authors:  I Söderkvist; P A Wedin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.

Authors:  M Desmurget; C Prablanc; M Arzi; Y Rossetti; Y Paulignan; C Urquizar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Final posture of the upper limb depends on the initial position of the hand during prehension movements.

Authors:  M Desmurget; H Gréa; C Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Prehension of objects oriented in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  P Mamassian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Postural control of three-dimensional prehension movements.

Authors:  M Desmurget; C Prablanc
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man.

Authors:  J F Soechting; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 6.167

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.