Literature DB >> 9120586

Postural control of three-dimensional prehension movements.

M Desmurget1, C Prablanc.   

Abstract

This experiment was carried out to test the hypothesis that three-dimensional upper limb movements could be initiated and controlled in the joint space via a mechanism comparing an estimate of the current postural state of the upper arm with a target value determined by one specific inverse static transform converting the coordinates of the object into a set of arm, forearm, and wrist angles. This hypothesis involves two main predictions: 1) despite joint redundancy, the posture reached by the upper limb should be invariant for a given context; and 2) a movement programmed in joint space should exhibit invariant characteristics of the joint covariation pattern as well as a corresponding variable hand path curvature in the task space. To test these predictions, we examined prehension movements toward a cylindrical object presented at a fixed spatial location and at various orientations without vision of the moving limb. Once presented, the object orientation was either kept constant (unperturbed trials) or suddenly modified at movement onset (perturbed trials). Three-dimensional movement trajectories were analyzed in both joint and task spaces. For the unperturbed trials, the task space analysis showed a variable hand path curvature depending on object orientation. The joint space analysis showed that the seven final angles characterizing the upper limb posture at hand-to-object contact varied monotonically with object orientation. At a dynamic level, movement onset and end were nearly identical for all joints. Moreover, for all joints having a monotonic variation, maximum velocity occurred almost simultaneously. For the elbow, the only joint presenting a reversal, the reversal was synchronized with the time to peak velocity of the other joint angles. For the perturbed trials, a smooth and complete compensation of the movement trajectory was observed in the task space. At a static level the upper limb final posture was identical to that obtained when the object was initially presented at the orientation following the perturbation. This result was particularly remarkable considering the large set of comfortable postures allowed by joint redundancy. At a dynamic level, the joints' covariation pattern was updated to reach the new target posture. The initial synergies were not disrupted by the perturbation, but smoothly modified, the different joints' movements ending nearly at the same time. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that prehension movements are initiated and controlled in the joint space on the basis of a joint angular error vector rather than a spatial error vector.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9120586     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of nonvisual feedback loops during reaching: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  M Desmurget; H Gréa; J S Grethe; C Prablanc; G E Alexander; S T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effect of accuracy constraint on joint coordination during pointing movements.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; John P Scholz; Gregor Schöner; Lawrence Hotchkiss
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hand shaping using hapsis resembles visually guided hand shaping.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Posture-based or trajectory-based movement planning: a comparison of direct and indirect pointing movements.

Authors:  Frouke Hermens; Stan Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  No automatic pilot for visually guided aiming based on colour.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Ian M Franks; James T Enns; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp.

Authors:  Jing Fan; Jiping He; Stephen I Helms Tillery
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Modeling 3D object manipulation: synchronous single-axis joint rotations?

Authors:  Mary D Klein Breteler; Ruud G J Meulenbroek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Motor equivalence and self-motion induced by different movement speeds.

Authors:  J P Scholz; T Dwight-Higgin; J E Lynch; Y W Tseng; V Martin; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Partial tuning of motor cortex neurons to final posture in a free-moving paradigm.

Authors:  Tyson N Aflalo; Michael S A Graziano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Role of the medial parieto-occipital cortex in the control of reaching and grasping movements.

Authors:  Claudio Galletti; Dieter F Kutz; Michela Gamberini; Rossella Breveglieri; Patrizia Fattori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.