Literature DB >> 9588786

Final posture of the upper limb depends on the initial position of the hand during prehension movements.

M Desmurget1, H Gréa, C Prablanc.   

Abstract

The question of knowing how the nervous system transforms a desired position and orientation of the hand into a set of arm and forearm angles has been widely addressed during the last few decades. Despite this fact, it still remains unclear as to whether a unique posture of the arm is associated with every location and orientation of the hand in space. The main objective of the present study a was to address this question. To this end, we studied a prehension task requiring human subjects to reach and grasp a cylindrical object presented at different locations, along variable orientations. In contrast to previous investigations, we considered the influence of the initial position of the hand. Results showed that the posture of the arm: (1) varied systematically as a function of the movement starting point; (2) was stereotyped for a particular subject given a configuration of the object and a movement starting location; (3) was altered at both the distal and proximal levels when the orientation of the object was changed; (4) was similarly influenced by the experimental factors in all the subjects, except one. When considered together, the previous results support three main conclusions: First, the nervous system solves the joint redundancy problem using fixed strategies. Second, these fixed strategies do not provide a single correspondence between hand configuration and arm posture. Third, the position and orientation of the hand in space are unlikely to be controlled through separate independent neural pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9588786     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Effect of accuracy constraint on joint coordination during pointing movements.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; John P Scholz; Gregor Schöner; Lawrence Hotchkiss
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Posture-based or trajectory-based movement planning: a comparison of direct and indirect pointing movements.

Authors:  Frouke Hermens; Stan Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp.

Authors:  Jing Fan; Jiping He; Stephen I Helms Tillery
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modeling 3D object manipulation: synchronous single-axis joint rotations?

Authors:  Mary D Klein Breteler; Ruud G J Meulenbroek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of orientation on prehension movement time.

Authors:  Elsje van Bergen; Lisa M van Swieten; Justin H G Williams; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor equivalence and self-motion induced by different movement speeds.

Authors:  J P Scholz; T Dwight-Higgin; J E Lynch; Y W Tseng; V Martin; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Palmar arch dynamics during reach-to-grasp tasks.

Authors:  Archana P Sangole; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The coordination of upper and lower arm rotation.

Authors:  Ali Alazmani; Peter Culmer; Martin Levesley; Mark Mon-Williams; Bipin Bhakta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport-grasp coordination.

Authors:  Jarugool Tretriluxana; James Gordon; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Unpredictable elbow joint perturbation during reaching results in multijoint motor equivalence.

Authors:  D J S Mattos; M L Latash; E Park; J Kuhl; J P Scholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.