Literature DB >> 18936904

Genetic changes at specific stages of breast cancer progression detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

Yuxia Gao1, Yun Niu, Xiaowei Wang, Li Wei, Song Lu.   

Abstract

Although a simple linear progression model for breast cancer has already been proposed, its validity still remains controversial. Especially, the genetic and molecular features of breast cancer at different stages during the development and progression, as well as their relationship, have rarely been studied under the same experimental conditions simultaneously. According to these limitations in this research area, the current study applied comparative genomic hybridization technique to investigate genomic changes in 15 cases of breast atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 15 cases of ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), and 15 cases of invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) and the relationship among the genetic changes. Thirty commonly altered regions that were identified included known (gains of 1q,8q, 17q,20q,Xq and losses of 8p,13q,16q,17p,22q) and several uncharacterized (gains of 2q,5p, 10p,12q,16p,18q, etc. and losses of 11p13-pter,11q,14q,Xp, etc). The overall frequency of copy number losses was higher in IDC than that in DCIS (P = 0.013). ADH showed more frequent gain of 17q than that in IDC (P = 0.007), and IDC exhibited a higher frequency for the loss of 22q than that in ADH (P = 0.018). On one hand, several common genomic changes shared by ADH, DCIS, and IDC make a linear relationship for these three lesions possible. On the other hand, the heterogeneity has also showed clonal diversification and different pathways of breast cancer progression. The regions of chromosomal copy number alterations may bring new insights into the strategy for tumor progression blocking and the discovery of new potential targets for breast cancer treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18936904     DOI: 10.1007/s00109-008-0408-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)        ISSN: 0946-2716            Impact factor:   4.599


  28 in total

1.  20q gain associates with immortalization: 20q13.2 amplification correlates with genome instability in human papillomavirus 16 E7 transformed human uroepithelial cells.

Authors:  E Savelieva; C D Belair; M A Newton; S DeVries; J W Gray; F Waldman; C A Reznikoff
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1997-02-06       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  WWOX, a novel WW domain-containing protein mapping to human chromosome 16q23.3-24.1, a region frequently affected in breast cancer.

Authors:  A K Bednarek; K J Laflin; R L Daniel; Q Liao; K A Hawkins; C M Aldaz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Genetic changes in paired atypical and usual ductal hyperplasia of the breast by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  G Gong; S DeVries; K L Chew; I Cha; B M Ljung; F M Waldman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  gamma -Secretase cleavage and nuclear localization of ErbB-4 receptor tyrosine kinase.

Authors:  C Y Ni; M P Murphy; T E Golde; G Carpenter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Genetic progression, histological grade, and allelic loss in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  H Fujii; R Szumel; C Marsh; W Zhou; E Gabrielson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Patterns of chromosomal alterations in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  E Shelley Hwang; Sandy DeVries; Karen L Chew; Dan H Moore; Karla Kerlikowske; Ann Thor; Britt-Marie Ljung; Frederic M Waldman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Kremen proteins are Dickkopf receptors that regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signalling.

Authors:  Bingyu Mao; Wei Wu; Gary Davidson; Joachim Marhold; Mingfa Li; Bernard M Mechler; Hajo Delius; Dana Hoppe; Peter Stannek; Carmen Walter; Andrei Glinka; Christof Niehrs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Amplification of chromosomal region 20q13 in invasive breast cancer: prognostic implications.

Authors:  M M Tanner; M Tirkkonen; A Kallioniemi; K Holli; C Collins; D Kowbel; J W Gray; O P Kallioniemi; J Isola
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Comparative genomic hybridization: a new tool in cancer pathology.

Authors:  M A Hermsen; G A Meijer; J P Baak; H Joenje; J J Walboomers
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  PHOTOPROBE biotin: an alternative method for labeling archival DNA for comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Dirk Korinth; Konrad Donhuijsen; Ulrike Bockmühl; Iver Petersen
Journal:  Cell Oncol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.730

View more
  17 in total

1.  Breast cancer precursors: lessons learned from molecular genetics.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Sinn
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  PI3K pathway activation in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ--implications for progression to invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Rita A Sakr; Britta Weigelt; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Victor P Andrade; Elena Guerini-Rocco; Dilip Giri; Charlotte K Y Ng; Catherine F Cowell; Neal Rosen; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Tari A King
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Chaos and Consequence.

Authors:  Vidya C Sinha; Helen Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Invasive cribriform carcinoma in a Chinese population: comparison with low-grade invasive ductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Tongxian Zhang; Zhichun Lin; Xuebao Zhang; Fen Liu; Yahong Wang; Han Liu; Yiling Yang; Yun Niu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-02-15

5.  Understanding the premalignant potential of atypical hyperplasia through its natural history: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Lynn C Hartmann; Derek C Radisky; Marlene H Frost; Richard J Santen; Robert A Vierkant; Lorelle L Benetti; Yaman Tarabishy; Karthik Ghosh; Daniel W Visscher; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-01-30

6.  Weighted gene co-expression network analysis in identification of metastasis-related genes of lung squamous cell carcinoma based on the Cancer Genome Atlas database.

Authors:  Feng Tian; Jinlong Zhao; Xinlei Fan; Zhenxing Kang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Presence of an in situ component is associated with reduced biological aggressiveness of size-matched invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  H Wong; S Lau; T Yau; P Cheung; R J Epstein
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Copy number analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ with and without recurrence.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Sally M Hunter; Jia-Min Pang; Ken Opeskin; Prue Hill; Simone M Rowley; David Y H Choong; Ella R Thompson; Alexander Dobrovic; Stephen B Fox; G Bruce Mann; Ian G Campbell
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 9.  Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: revisited.

Authors:  Catherine F Cowell; Britta Weigelt; Rita A Sakr; Charlotte K Y Ng; James Hicks; Tari A King; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Genomic landscape of ductal carcinoma in situ and association with progression.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Lin; Sujay Vennam; Natasha Purington; Eric Lin; Sushama Varma; Summer Han; Manisha Desa; Tina Seto; Nicholas J Wang; Henning Stehr; Megan L Troxell; Allison W Kurian; Robert B West
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.