Literature DB >> 24480577

Understanding the premalignant potential of atypical hyperplasia through its natural history: a longitudinal cohort study.

Lynn C Hartmann1, Derek C Radisky, Marlene H Frost, Richard J Santen, Robert A Vierkant, Lorelle L Benetti, Yaman Tarabishy, Karthik Ghosh, Daniel W Visscher, Amy C Degnim.   

Abstract

Atypical hyperplasia is a high-risk premalignant lesion of the breast, but its biology is poorly understood. Many believe that atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is a direct precursor for low-grade ductal breast cancer, whereas atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) serves as a risk indicator. These assumptions underlie current clinical recommendations. We tested these assumptions by studying the characteristics of the breast cancers that develop in women with ADH or ALH. Using the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort, we identified all women with ADH or ALH from 1967 to 2001 and followed them for later breast cancers, characterizing side of breast cancer versus side of atypia; time to breast cancer; type, histology, and grade of breast cancer, looking for patterns consistent with precursors versus risk indicators. A total of 698 women with atypical hyperplasia were followed a mean of 12.5 years; 143 developed breast cancer. For both ADH and ALH, there is a 2:1 ratio of ipsilateral to contralateral breast cancer. The ipsilateral predominance is marked in the first 5 years, consistent with a precursor phenotype for both ADH and ALH. For both, there is a predominance of invasive ductal cancers with 69% of moderate or high grade. Twenty-five percent are node positive. Both ADH and ALH portend risk for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancers, predominantly ductal, with two thirds moderate or high grade. The ipsilateral breast is at especially high risk for breast cancer in the first 5 years after atypia, with risk remaining elevated in both breasts long term. ADH and ALH behave similarly in terms of later breast cancer endpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24480577      PMCID: PMC4167687          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  50 in total

1.  An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions.

Authors:  S R Wellings; H M Jensen; R G Marcum
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  D L Page; W D Dupont; L W Rogers; M S Rados
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Pathologic features of breast cancers in women with previous benign breast disease.

Authors:  T W Jacobs; C Byrne; G Colditz; J L Connolly; S J Schnitt
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  On the origin and progression of ductal carcinoma in the human breast.

Authors:  S R Wellings; H M Jensen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Accumulation of chromosomal imbalances from intraductal proliferative lesions to adjacent in situ and invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  M M Aubele; M C Cummings; A E Mattis; H F Zitzelsberger; A K Walch; M Kremer; H Höfler; M Werner
Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol       Date:  2000-03

6.  Atypical lobular hyperplasia as a unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  David L Page; Peggy A Schuyler; William D Dupont; Roy A Jensen; W Dale Plummer; Jean F Simpson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Lobular neoplasia in breast core needle biopsy specimens is not associated with an increased risk of ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew A Renshaw; Norberto Cartagena; Robert P Derhagopian; Edwin W Gould
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease.

Authors:  W D Dupont; D L Page
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  44 in total

1.  ERβ expression and breast cancer risk prediction for women with atypias.

Authors:  Tina J Hieken; Jodi M Carter; John R Hawse; Tanya L Hoskin; Melanie Bois; Marlene Frost; Lynn C Hartmann; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-08-14

2.  Extent of atypical hyperplasia stratifies breast cancer risk in 2 independent cohorts of women.

Authors:  Amy C Degnim; William D Dupont; Derek C Radisky; Robert A Vierkant; Ryan D Frank; Marlene H Frost; Stacey J Winham; Melinda E Sanders; Jeffrey R Smith; David L Page; Tanya L Hoskin; Celine M Vachon; Karthik Ghosh; Tina J Hieken; Lori A Denison; Jodi M Carter; Lynn C Hartmann; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Flat epithelial atypia and risk of breast cancer: A Mayo cohort study.

Authors:  Samar M Said; Daniel W Visscher; Aziza Nassar; Ryan D Frank; Robert A Vierkant; Marlene H Frost; Karthik Ghosh; Derek C Radisky; Lynn C Hartmann; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Addressing barriers to uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention for patients and providers.

Authors:  Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

5.  Clinicopathologic features of breast cancers that develop in women with previous benign breast disease.

Authors:  Daniel W Visscher; Marlene H Frost; Lynn C Hartmann; Ryan D Frank; Robert A Vierkant; Ann E McCullough; Stacey J Winham; Celine M Vachon; Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; Ann M Farrell; Yaman Tarabishy; Tina J Hieken; Tufia C Haddad; Ruth A Kraft; Derek C Radisky; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Current management of lesions associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Stuart J Schnitt; Larry Norton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  How Do We Approach Benign Proliferative Lesions?

Authors:  Faina Nakhlis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: A 29-Year Longitudinal Experience Evaluating Clinicopathologic Features and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Tari A King; Melissa Pilewskie; Shirin Muhsen; Sujata Patil; Starr K Mautner; Anna Park; Sabine Oskar; Elena Guerini-Rocco; Camilla Boafo; Jessica C Gooch; Marina De Brot; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Mary Morrogh; Victor P Andrade; Rita A Sakr; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Model for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk in Women With Atypical Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Amy C Degnim; Stacey J Winham; Ryan D Frank; V Shane Pankratz; William D Dupont; Robert A Vierkant; Marlene H Frost; Tanya L Hoskin; Celine M Vachon; Karthik Ghosh; Tina J Hieken; Jodi M Carter; Lori A Denison; Brendan Broderick; Lynn C Hartmann; Daniel W Visscher; Derek C Radisky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A comparison of mid-infrared spectral regions on accuracy of tissue classification.

Authors:  Shachi Mittal; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.