Literature DB >> 15297420

Patterns of chromosomal alterations in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

E Shelley Hwang1, Sandy DeVries, Karen L Chew, Dan H Moore, Karla Kerlikowske, Ann Thor, Britt-Marie Ljung, Frederic M Waldman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is thought to be a nonobligate precursor of invasive cancer. Genomic changes specific to pure DCIS versus invasive cancer, as well as alterations unique to individual DCIS subtypes, have not been fully defined. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Chromosomal copy number alterations were examined by comparative genomic hybridization in 34 cases of pure DCIS and compared with 12 cases of paired synchronous DCIS and invasive ductal cancer, as well as to 146 additional cases of invasive breast cancer of ductal or lobular histology. Genomic differences between high-grade and low/intermediate-grade DCIS, as well as between pure DCIS and invasive cancer, were identified.
RESULTS: Pure DCIS showed almost the same degree of chromosomal instability as invasive ductal cancers. A higher proportion of low/intermediate-grade versus high-grade DCIS had loss of 16q (65 versus 12%, respectively; P = 0.002). When compared with lower grade DCIS, high-grade DCIS exhibited more frequent gain of 17q (65 versus 41%; P = 0.15) and higher frequency loss of 8p (77 versus 41%; P = 0.04). Chromosomal alterations in those cases with synchronous DCIS and invasive ductal cancer showed a high degree of shared changes within the two components.
CONCLUSIONS: DCIS is genetically advanced, showing a similar degree of chromosomal alterations as invasive ductal cancer. The pattern of alterations differed between high- and low/intermediate-grade DCIS, supporting a model in which different histological grades of DCIS are associated with distinct genomic changes. These regions of chromosomal alterations may be potential targets for treatment and/or markers of prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15297420     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  49 in total

Review 1.  Microenvironmental control of the breast cancer cell cycle.

Authors:  Xun Guo; Yuehan Wu; Helen J Hathaway; Rebecca S Hartley
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  The influence of clinicopathological features on the predictive accuracy of conventional breast imaging in determining the extent of screen-detected high-grade pure ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  L Hayward; R S Oeppen; A V Grima; G T Royle; C M Rubin; R I Cutress
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Cell-matrix interactions in mammary gland development and breast cancer.

Authors:  John Muschler; Charles H Streuli
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Progression of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ from the Pathological Perspective.

Authors:  Pedro Oscar R Cunha; Mark Ornstein; J Louise Jones
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Genetic changes at specific stages of breast cancer progression detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Yuxia Gao; Yun Niu; Xiaowei Wang; Li Wei; Song Lu
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Contrasting DCIS and invasive breast cancer by subtype suggests basal-like DCIS as distinct lesions.

Authors:  Helga Bergholtz; Tonje G Lien; David M Swanson; Arnoldo Frigessi; Maria Grazia Daidone; Jörg Tost; Fredrik Wärnberg; Therese Sørlie
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-06-17

Review 7.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Chaos and Consequence.

Authors:  Vidya C Sinha; Helen Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Single-cell genetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer reveals enormous tumor heterogeneity yet conserved genomic imbalances and gain of MYC during progression.

Authors:  Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Lissa Y Berroa Garcia; Amanda Bradley; Clarymar Ortiz-Melendez; Woei-Jyh Lee; Rebecca Christensen; Sheila A Prindiville; Kathleen A Calzone; Peter W Soballe; Yue Hu; Salim A Chowdhury; Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Genomic heterogeneity of breast tumor pathogenesis.

Authors:  Rachel E Ellsworth; Jeffrey A Hooke; Craig D Shriver; Darrell L Ellsworth
Journal:  Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2009-07-29

10.  Analysis of the copy number profiles of several tumor samples from the same patient reveals the successive steps in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Eric Letouzé; Yves Allory; Marc A Bollet; François Radvanyi; Frédéric Guyon
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.