Literature DB >> 18931818

Women and men with hip fractures have a longer femoral neck moment arm and greater impact load in a sideways fall.

Q Wang1, J W Teo, A Ghasem-Zadeh, E Seeman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In a case control study, we report that women and men with hip fractures have a longer moment arm of the force applied on the proximal femur during a sideways fall, a structural feature that may contribute to fracture risk. The impact load and its direction during a sideways fall onto the greater trochanter are partly determined by the geometry of the proximal femur. We hypothesized that the hip geometry in elderly with hip fractures produces a greater impact on the hip during a sideways fall.
METHODS: We studied 41 female (77.2 +/- 9.9 years) and 22 male (76.2 +/- 12.1 years) patients with hip fractures and 40 female (85.7 +/- 6.0 years) and 17 male (84.3 +/- 10.1 years) controls. Hip geometry was analyzed on the nonfracture hip in patients and left hip in controls using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
RESULTS: There was no difference in areal bone mineral density (aBMD), hip axis length, femoral neck axis length, or neck-shaft angle between cases and controls. However, the moment arm of the force on the hip during a sideways fall was 7.3% and 9.5% longer resulting in 5.6% and 9.1% greater moment in such a fall in female and male cases relative to their respective controls independent of height and weight (all p < 0.056). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the moment arm length in a sideways fall was associated with increased risk of hip fracture in females (odds ratio = 1.91, 95%CI: 1.14-3.20 for each SD increase in moment arm length of sideways fall, p = 0.02) and males (odds ratio = 2.69, 95% CI, 1.19-6.09, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: A longer moment arm in the sideways fall increases the resultant force applied to the hip predisposing to hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18931818     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0768-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  30 in total

1.  Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women.

Authors:  S Gnudi; C Ripamonti; G Gualtieri; N Malavolta
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  C G Alonso; M D Curiel; F H Carranza; R P Cano; A D Peréz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Construction of the femoral neck during growth determines its strength in old age.

Authors:  Roger M D Zebaze; Anthony Jones; Mark Knackstedt; Ghassan Maalouf; Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Paul M Mayhew; C David Thomas; John G Clement; Nigel Loveridge; Thomas J Beck; William Bonfield; Chris J Burgoyne; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jul 9-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Varying contributions of growth and ageing to racial and sex differences in femoral neck structure and strength in old age.

Authors:  Xiao-Fang Wang; Yunbo Duan; Thomas J Beck; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J Parkkari; P Kannus; M Palvanen; A Natri; J Vainio; H Aho; I Vuori; M Järvinen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Bone mineral density, hip axis length and risk of hip fracture in men: results from the Cornwall Hip Fracture Study.

Authors:  I Pande; T W O'Neill; C Pritchard; D L Scott; A D Woolf
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.

Authors:  X G Cheng; G Lowet; S Boonen; P H Nicholson; P Brys; J Nijs; J Dequeker
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Hip axis length and osteoporotic fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; S R Cummings; M C Nevitt; A Pressman; M Jergas; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Measurement of femoral geometry in type I and type II osteoporosis: differences in hip axis length consistent with heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S Boonen; R Koutri; J Dequeker; J Aerssens; G Lowet; J Nijs; G Verbeke; E Lesaffre; P Geusens
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  11 in total

1.  Moment arms of the knee extensor mechanism in children and adults.

Authors:  Thomas D O'Brien; Neil D Reeves; Vasilios Baltzopoulos; David A Jones; Constantinos N Maganaris
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Skeletal deterioration following ovarian failure: can some features be a direct consequence of estrogen loss while others are more related to physical inactivity?

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Francisco Amado; José L Esteves; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Atypical femoral fractures, bisphosphonates, and mechanical stress.

Authors:  Per Aspenberg; Jörg Schilcher
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Femoral neck shaft angle width is associated with hip-fracture risk in males but not independently of femoral neck bone density.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; L Lisi; M Avella
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Prediction of incident hip fracture by femoral neck bone mineral density and neck-shaft angle: a 5-year longitudinal study in post-menopausal females.

Authors:  S Gnudi; E Sitta; E Pignotti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Atypical subtrochanteric femoral shaft fractures: role for mechanics and bone quality.

Authors:  Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Adele L Boskey
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  Genome-wide pleiotropy of osteoporosis-related phenotypes: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  David Karasik; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Yanhua Zhou; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel; Serkalem Demissie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Ethnic differences in bone health.

Authors:  Ayse Zengin; Ann Prentice; Kate Anna Ward
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  The manipulation of strain, when stress is controlled, modulates in vivo tendon mechanical properties but not systemic TGF-β1 levels.

Authors:  Gerard E McMahon; Christopher I Morse; Adrian Burden; Keith Winwood; Gladys L Onambélé-Pearson
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2013-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.