Literature DB >> 18931658

53BP1 facilitates long-range DNA end-joining during V(D)J recombination.

Simone Difilippantonio1, Eric Gapud, Nancy Wong, Ching-Yu Huang, Grace Mahowald, Hua Tang Chen, Michael J Kruhlak, Elsa Callen, Ferenc Livak, Michel C Nussenzweig, Barry P Sleckman, André Nussenzweig.   

Abstract

Variable, diversity and joining (V(D)J) recombination and class-switch recombination use overlapping but distinct non-homologous end joining pathways to repair DNA double-strand-break intermediates. 53BP1 is a DNA-damage-response protein that is rapidly recruited to sites of chromosomal double-strand breaks, where it seems to function in a subset of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase-, H2A histone family member X (H2AX, also known as H2AFX)- and mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1)-dependent events. A 53BP1-dependent end-joining pathway has been described that is dispensable for V(D)J recombination but essential for class-switch recombination. Here we report a previously unrecognized defect in the joining phase of V(D)J recombination in 53BP1-deficient lymphocytes that is distinct from that found in classical non-homologous-end-joining-, H2ax-, Mdc1- and Atm-deficient mice. Absence of 53BP1 leads to impairment of distal V-DJ joining with extensive degradation of unrepaired coding ends and episomal signal joint reintegration at V(D)J junctions. This results in apoptosis, loss of T-cell receptor alpha locus integrity and lymphopenia. Further impairment of the apoptotic checkpoint causes propagation of lymphocytes that have antigen receptor breaks. These data suggest a more general role for 53BP1 in maintaining genomic stability during long-range joining of DNA breaks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18931658      PMCID: PMC3596817          DOI: 10.1038/nature07476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


RAG1 and RAG2 (RAG1/2) proteins perform the pair wise cleavage step in V(D)J recombination, whereas activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) triggers the formation of DSBs in the switch regions during CSR[5]. RAG1/2- and AID- induced lesions in antigen receptor loci initiate nuclear focus formation of the DNA damage response proteins γ-H2AX, NBS1 and 53BP1 over a large chromosome domain[5-8]. Based on the analysis of CSR in H2AX-[9], Atm-[7], and 53BP1-deficient[3, 4, 10, 11] lymphocytes, it was proposed that focus forming factors might promote and/or maintain synapsis of distal switch regions[9]. In the case of 53BP1-deficiency, there is an almost complete loss of long range CSR[3, 4, 12] and a concomitant increase in the frequency of short-range intra switch recombination[12]. Paradoxically, although V(D)J recombination and CSR employ similar DSB repair mechanisms, there are no known defects in V(D)J recombination in the absence of 53BP1[3, 4]. 53BP1−/− mice show a 50–80% reduction in the number of B and T lineage cells, respectively, in bone-marrow and thymus (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b and [13]). This is similar to the lymphopenia found in H2AX−/−, MDC1−/− and Atm−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 1 and 2)[14, 15]. Atm−/− thymocytes express low levels of TCRαβ receptor, and we found a comparable defect in 53BP1−/− but not in H2AX−/− or MDC1−/− thymocytes (Supplementary Fig. 1c; Supplementary Fig.2b). In addition, there was a reduction in the number of γ–δ T cells in the 53BP1−/− thymus and spleen (Supplementary Fig. 1d), and a marked increase in apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Transgenic expression of TCRαβ in the absence of endogenous recombination rescued the number of thymocytes to levels comparable to that of littermate controls (Supplementary Fig. 3), suggesting that decreased cellularity of the 53BP1−/− thymus was due to defective V(D)J recombination. To ascertain whether recombination defects exist in 53BP1−/−, H2AX−/− or MDC1−/− thymocytes, we initially assayed for TCRα locus integrity by 3 dimensional interphase DNA-FISH with 5’ and 3’ BAC probes (Fig. 1a)[16]. The probes were detected as two pairs of signals in the majority (>94 %) of WT, H2AX−/− and MDC1−/− thymocytes (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Fig. 2c). More rarely, WT, H2AX−/− and MDC1−/− thymocytes had either lost Cα (2 TCRVα, 1 TCRCα signal; up to 0.1 % of thymocytes) or both Vα and Cα from one allele (1 TCRVα, 1 TCRCα; up to 0.7% of thymocytes). In contrast to H2AX−/− and MDC1−/−, 53BP1−/− thymocytes exhibited a 7-fold increase in the number of aberrant cells (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Fig. 2c). Even when one TCR locus was entirely lost (1TCRVα, 1TCRCα), simultaneous hybridization with a centromeric chromosome 14 BAC probe confirmed that both chromosomes were present (data not shown), suggesting extensive but not complete chromosome 14 degradation (see below). Thus, 53BP1 is required for the stability of the TCRα locus, although the frequency of aberrant cells is higher in Atm−/− mice (Fig. 1a)[16].
Figure 1

Antigen-receptor-associated aberrations in 53BP1−/− lymphocytes

a, Upper panel: schematic of the TCRα-TCRδ locus with positions of the BACs used for generation of DNA-FISH probes indicated. Middle panel: Representative examples of projections of confocal sections, analyzed by three-dimensional FISH on freshly isolated thymocytes. Bottom panel: frequency at which TCRcα or (TCRvα+ TCRcα) signal is lost from one allele in WT, 53BP1−/−, p53−/−, 53BP1−/−p53−/−, 53BP1−/−Nbs1 and Atm−/− thymocytes (>200 cells analyzed per genotype in each of two experiments;error bars, s.d.). b, TCRα associated chromosomal aberrations in lymph node T cells determined by FISH using a TCRα locus spanning BAC (red signal, right panel), a chromosome 14 paint (green signal, right panel) and a telomere repeat specific probe (white signal, right panel). T cells were stimulated with anti-TCR/CD28 antibodies for 48 hours. (error bars, s.d., n≥3).c, Frequency of IgH-associated abnormalities in metaphase spreads from bone marrow and splenic B cells from WT, 53BP1−/−, 53BP1−/−p53−/− and 53BP1−/−Nbs1 mice (error bars, s.d., n≥3). B220+ bone marrow cells were cultured on irradiated S17 stromal cells in the presence of IL7 for 5 days. Splenic CD43-negative B cells were cultured for 1 day with RP105, which induces proliferation but not CSR[8]. FISH was performed using probes specific for the IgHcα locus (red signal, right panel), chromosome 12 (green signal, right panel) and telomeric repeats (white signal, right panel).

To determine whether extensive thymocyte cell death or the stability of the TCRα locus is affected by pro-survival factors we bred 53BP1-deficient mice with p53- deficient (p53−/−) or mutant Nbs1 mice lacking the pro-apoptotic C-terminal portion of (Nbs1)[17]. Although these crosses reduced the number of TUNEL positive thymocytes (Supplementary Fig. 1e, data not shown), they failed to rescue either the cellular or developmental defects associated with 53BP1-deficiency (Supplementary Fig. 1a–d). However, further loss of the TCRα locus to levels approaching Atm-deficiency was found in double mutant 53BP1−/−p53−/− and 53BP1−/−Nbs1 mice (Fig. 1a). Thus, although enhanced survival is insufficient to rescue lymphocyte development in 53BP1−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 1), some of the 53BP1−/− thymocytes that harbor un-repaired breaks in the TCR locus eventually die by a p53- and Nbs1-sensitive mechanism. Our finding that loss of TCRα locus integrity is exacerbated in 53BP1−/− thymocytes that are also p53- or Nbs1- deficient led us to investigate whether such cells would maintain V(D)J recombination induced chromosome aberrations in mature peripheral lymphocytes as previously shown in Atm−/− mice[8]. Whereas TCRα-associated chromosome breaks and translocations were undetectable or rare in metaphases from WT and 53BP1−/− lymph node T cells, they were found in 53BP1−/−p53−/− and 53BP1−/−Nbs1 doubly deficient mice at similar levels as seen in Atm−/− mice (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Table 1 and [8]). Likewise, concomitant loss of p53 or the Nbs1-C terminus resulted in increased IgH-specific aberrations in 53BP1−/− bone marrow, and these aberrations were maintained in the peripheral B cell compartment (Fig. 1c; Supplementary Table 1). We conclude that the long-term persistence of V(D)J recombination induced aberrations in 53BP1 knockout mice is limited by an intact apoptotic checkpoint. Although antigen receptor associated DSBs occur in 53BP1−/− lymphocytes (Fig. 1b, c), previous semi-quantitative analysis of TCRα rearrangements showed no defect[4]. However, measurement of recombination efficiency at this locus is complicated by the fact that there are multiple gene segments (100 Vα and 61 Jα), and TCRα alleles undergo primary and secondary rearrangements. To examine V(D)J recombination quantitatively, we evaluated rearrangements in mice homozygous for the TCRα allele, in which the 61 gene Jα cluster was replaced by 2 Jα segments[18] (Fig. 2a). Southern blot analysis of TCRα:WT, TCRα:53BP1−/−, and TCRα:Atm−/− thymocyte DNA was used to assess aberrant Jα56 coding end accumulation. As previously documented, Jα56 coding ends accumulate as a discrete fragment in TCRα:Atm−/− but not in TCRα:WT thymocytes suggesting an end-joining defect in the absence of ATM[18] (Fig. 2a). Notably, multiple independent preparations of TCRα:53BP1−/− thymocytes displayed abnormal joining and coding end degradation, as evidenced by the CαI probe hybridizing with diffuse DNA fragments that migrated below the expected size of the Jα56 coding end (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) labeling of DNA ends revealed accumulation of the Jα coding ends and a broad smear of DNA that migrated below Jα61 in TCRα:53BP1−/− thymocytes (Fig. 2b,c). Taken together, these results suggest that in the absence of 53BP1 there is a repair defect and extensive nucleolytic processing of un-repaired V(D)J recombination induced coding ends.
Figure 2

Processing of Jα coding ends in 53BP1 deficient thymocytes

a, Southern blot analysis of total thymocyte and kidney DNA digested with StuI and hybridized with a CαI probe. The same blot was stripped and re-probed with a RAG2 probe as a loading control. The fragments corresponding to the germline TCRα allele (*) allele, the Jα56 coding ends, as well as the molecular mass markers (in kb) are indicated. b, Strategy for PCR amplification of free Jα coding ends captured by TdT-mediated poly-adenylation. c, Southern blot analysis of coding ends from TCRα:WT and TCRα:53BP1−/− thymocytes. Serial five-fold dilutions and a mock-polyadenylated control are shown. IL-2 gene PCR templated with serial five-fold dilutions of the genomic DNA used for polyadenylation is shown as a loading control. d, Examples of sequences of coding joints formed by V(D)J recombination. Germline coding sequences (bold face lowercase letters) are indicated on the top. Nucleotide insertions (P/N) are indicated by capital letters. Sequences of insertsa–d are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

To determine whether aberrant V(D)J recombination products were present in 53BP1 knockout thymocytes, we cloned and sequenced TCRβ, TCRα and TCRδ coding junctions (n=273) from 53BP1−/− thymocytes. We found no statistically significant difference in the overall number of deletions or insertions at T-cell receptor loci (Supplementary Table 2). Furthermore, unlike classical NHEJ deficient mice, in which the majority of joins contain short stretches of homology indicative of an alternative end-joining mechanism[19], there was no bias in micro-homology joins in 53BP1−/− mice (Supplementary Table 2). Nevertheless, four of the 53BP1−/− junctions contained deletions >300 bp, four contained inserts >170 bp, and two of these junctions with insertions also showed significant degradation of V and J segments (Fig. 2d). In contrast, none of the 201 WT junctions analyzed showed such abnormalities. Interestingly, the captured insertions in 53BP1−/− junctions were not random, but were derived from intervening DNA that is normally deleted (Fig. 3d). This reintegration of excised episomes during V(D)J recombination constitutes a source of genome instability, and resembles the abnormalities reported for CSR junctions in 53BP1−/− B cells[12].
Figure 3

Decreased efficiency of long-range VDJ recombination and TCRα locus contraction in 53BP1−/− thymocytes

a, Schematic of the mouse TCRα/δ locus is shown in the top panel with the four different TCRδ rearrangements depicted individually below. Frequency of TCRδ locus rearrangements in total thymocytes from 53BP1−/− and WT littermates. Quantitative assessment of genomic DNA rearrangements of Dδ1 to Dδ2, Dδ2 to Jδ1, and Vδ4 and Vδ5 to (D)Jδ1 genes were performed by quantitative PCR and normalized to the signal of the non-rearranging DNA 3’ of Jδ2. Results are averaged from 4 53BP1−/− and 2 WT mice with duplicate measurements, and standard errors of the mean are shown. (WT vs. 53BP1−/−: D2-J1, p=0.851; D1–D2, p=0.001;V4-DJ1, p=0.003; V5-DJ1, p<0.001). b, Distances separating the TCRVα and TCRCα loci in freshly isolated CD4/CD8 double negative (DN) or double positive (DP) thymocytes. The data were obtained by three-dimensional DNA-FISH using the TCRα BAC probes as indicated (top panel). As control, the probe set RP23-309A8 and RP24-336F10 (1Mb distance) on mouse chromosome 1D was used. Light grey bars: 0 to 0.3 µm; dark grey bars: 0.3–0.5 µm and black bars: 0.5 to 2 µm. Distance distribution histograms are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4, and Supplementary Table 3 lists sample sizes and average distances. (error bars, s.d.; *****: p<0.0001).

Defective CSR in the absence of 53BP1 is associated with an increase in short-range intra switch recombination[12]. To determine whether 53BP1 facilitates joining of distal gene segments during V(D)J recombination, we performed quantitative PCR assays of partial (Dδ2-Jδ1 and Dδ1–Dδ2) and complete (Vδ5-Dδ1 and Vδ4-Dδ1) rearrangements. We found that short range (Dδ2-Jδ1 and Dδ1–Dδ2) rearrangements were similar to, or even more abundant in 53BP1−/− than in WT thymocytes (Fig. 3a). In contrast, complete Vδ to DδJδ recombination was reduced approximately 2.5 fold in 53BP1 knockout thymocytes (Fig. 3a). To further substantiate these findings we compared Jα usage in 53BP1−/− and WT thymocytes. Long range primary Vα-Jα rearrangements (involving at least 200 kb) use Jα segments at the 5’ end of the Jα array and these are replaced by shorter-range secondary rearrangements that use progressively more 3’ segments at the end of the Jα locus. Comparison of Jα usage in 53BP1−/− and WT thymocytes revealed that the 5’ proximal Jα segments were under-represented in 53BP1−/− mice by at least 2-fold while distal ones were relatively increased (Supplementary Fig. 4). Taken together, these data suggest that long-range V(D)J recombination is impaired in 53BP1 knockout mice whereas short-range recombination is not affected and may be favored. If distal joining were preferentially impaired, we would expect that the distances separating the TCR Vα and Jα segments would be greater in the absence of 53BP1. To study the compaction state of the TCRα locus, we measured distances between 5’ Vα and 3’ Cα probes in CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) thymocytes that are actively undergoing TCRα recombination (Fig. 3b). Three different 5’ and 3’ BAC probe sets separated by 0.820 Mb (proximal), 1.6 Mb (middle) and 2.1 Mb (distal) were used to map spatial distances along the TCRα locus (Fig. 3b). The average distance (D) between proximal probes (334B8-255N13) was similar in WT (D=0.216 µM) and 53BP1−/− DP thymocytes (D=0.225 µM, WT vs. 53BP1−/−, p=0.57, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test), and 81–83% of the alleles were separated by distances of less than 0.3 µM in both cases (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 3, and Supplementary Fig. 5). In contrast, the distribution of distances amongst intact TCRα alleles in 53BP1−/− DP thymocytes was substantially shifted towards larger separations when assessed using either middle (74E19-17317) or distal (304L21-10K20) probe sets (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 3, and Supplementary Fig. 5). For example, the average distance between the 5’ and 3’ ends of the TCRα locus was 1.4-fold greater in 53BP1−/− compared to WT DP thymocytes (Fig. 3b; middle probes, WT: D= 0.273 µM; 53BP1−/−: D=0.396 µM, p<0.0001;distal probes, WT: D=0.287 µM; 53BP1−/−: D=0.426 µM, p<0.0001). In 53BP1−/− DP thymocytes, middle and distal genes were separated by 0.5–2 µM in 23–32% of nuclei compared to only 7–9% in WT. In contrast to DP thymocytes, the distribution of spatial distances was similar for loci not undergoing recombination (chromosome band 1D and the TCRα locus in CD4−/−CD8−/− (DN) thymoctyes; Fig. 3b and Supplementary Table 3). We conclude that the distal portion of the TCRα locus is in a more extended state in 53BP1−/− DP thymocytes. RAG1/2 initiates recombination by binding to a single recombination signal sequence (RSS) and introduces a lesion in the target DNA[20,21] (Fig 4, steps 1, 2). It is believed that a synaptic complex is produced when a second RSS is captured[20, 21]. 53BP1 interacts constitutively with chromatin in the absence of DNA damage via its methyl-histone binding Tudor domain[22,23,24]. 53BP1 oligomerization[25] may promote a basal level of RSS synapsis by increasing the effective local concentration of the RSSs, thereby promoting their pairing (Fig. 4, steps 1, 2). 53BP1 has also been reported to interact with motor proteins[26], which may enhance chromatin mobility. Upon DNA damage the affinity of 53BP1 for DNA is increased by mechanisms that involve interaction with H2AX and MDC1[1, 2, 24]. We speculate that the initiating lesions in V(D)J recombination promote high affinity binding of 53BP1, and that this further amplifies 53BP1 homo-oligomerization and therefore the efficiency of long-range synapsis (Fig. 4, step 3). 53BP1 recruitment to DSB-flanking chromatin could also serve an important role in the post-cleavage phase of the recombination reaction by protecting coding ends from premature release from the synaptic complex and from degradation before the breaks are repaired by NHEJ (Fig. 4, steps 4 and 5). Similarly, joining of distal switch regions during CSR would be favored by high affinity binding of 53BP1 and local chromatin contraction to bring together damaged DNA ends[3, 4,10–12].
Figure 4

Model for 53BP1’s role in promoting and/or maintaining synapsis during V(D)J recombination

Before recombination, 53BP1 is loosely associated with chromatin (Step 1). RSS’s that are at a close physical distance (a) spend more time near the RAG1/2- bound RSS than distant RSS’s (b), and have a high probability of synapsis whether or not 53BP1 is present. 53BP1 homo-oligomerization increases the effective local concentration of distant RSSs thereby promoting their pairing. When RAG1/2 associates with and cleaves a single RSS, 53BP1 accumulates at the lesion and binds tightly to flanking chromatin in a manner dependent on H2AX and MDC1 (Steps 2 and 3). After RAG1/2 mediated DSB formation (step 4), 53BP1 stabilizes the post-cleavage complex, thereby increasing the efficiency of non-homologous end-joining (Step 5).

Such a model would be compatible with the NHEJ defect in the absence of 53BP1 due to loss of both “basal” and DNA damage induced RSS tethering, and with the mild joining defect in the absence of H2AX or MDC1, where only the DSB induced amplification of 53BP1’s affinity for damaged chromatin is impaired. We propose that 53BP1-mediated chromosome tethering and/or mobility evolved to facilitate chromosomal end-joining, and thereby favor long-range interactions between DNA ends that have an otherwise low probability of encountering each other[27].

Online Methods

Metaphase and interphase FISH

Metaphase spreads from cultured lymphocytes were prepared and analyzed by FISH[8] using BAC probes containing the TCRα locus (TCR Cα-17317 and TCR Vα-RP24-74E19), the IgH locus (IgH Vα-224M14), IgH Cα (from Cγ1- 3’of Cα) and a telomere-repeat specific peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe (Applied Biosystems). Three dimensional FISH on freshly isolated thymocytes using TCRvα and TCRcα locus specific probes was performed as described[8]. Confocal image stacks were collected using a Zeiss LSM510 META microscope equipped with a 63× Plan-Apochromat (N.A. 1.4) objective lens with 0.07µm X-Y pixel sampling, optical slice thickness of 0.8µm, and Z-step size of 0.2µm. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn around FISH spots to be measured. Within the individual VOIs, the center of intensity mass was calculated for each FISH spot and the 3-dimensional distance between red and green spots was measured using customized software (MIPAV, CIT/NIH). Tetraspeck fluorescent microspheres (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen) 0.1µm and 0.5µm in diameter were imaged using the same microscope parameters and used to model the point spread function of the microscope, fluorescence channel alignment, and to determine the validity of the MIPAV software to accurately measure the center of intensity mass of a fluorescence object. The minimum measurable distance between the two fluorescence points was 70nm in the lateral dimension. For distance measurements the following TCRα probe sets were used: RP24-334B8 and RP23-255N13 (proximal), RP24-74E19 and 17317 (middle), RP23-304L21 and RP23-10K20 (distal) and as control RP23-309A8 and RP24-336F10 which are separated by 1 Mb and map to mouse chromosome 1D.

Flow cytometry

Thymocytes were washed twice in HBSS containing 0.1% BSA and 0.1% NaN3 and stained with antibodies specific for CD4, CD8, TCRβ (H57-597), TCR γδ (GL3) (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA).

PCR and junction analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated from thymocytes using a QIAGEN DNA isolation kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). 50ng DNA was PCR amplified with a combination of gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table 3) using Platinum Taq polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for standard, or the Power Sybr Green™ Master Mix kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) for qPCR. Real-time qPCR was performed in duplicate and data were collected on an ABI 9700 Sequence Analyzer and analyzed using the SDS 2.2 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For each assay, aliquots of DNA were analyzed for a control, non-rearranging DNA 3’ of Jδ2. The cycle threshold numbers for each primer combinations (Ctexp) and for the control amplification (Ctctr) were used to calculate the absolute amount of PCR signal. The relative ratios of each rearrangement were averaged and plotted together with the standard error of the mean. For sequence analysis, 150 ng of thymocyte DNA was used to amplify coding joints which were cloned using a TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). Primers for TCRβ coding joints were published[28]. To PCR amplify TCR V-DJδ coding joint sequences, Vδ primers were used as forward primers with the primer 3Jδ1 as reverse primer (Supplementary Table 4). Junctions from TCRαSJ mice were amplified using the indicated primers (Supplementary Table 4). TCR Jα usage was determined as previously described[29].

Southern blot analysis

Southern blot analysis was carried out as previously described[18]. Briefly, 10 µg of total thymus genomic DNA was digested with StuI (New England Biolabs). The digest products were run out on a 1% agarose TAE gel, transferred onto Zeta-Probe GT membrane and probed with the Cα-I for coding joints and coding ends. The same membrane was stripped and reprobed with RAG2 as a loading control.

TdT-mediated polyadenylation and PCR amplification of free Jα coding ends

One µg of genomic DNA was treated with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (New England Biolabs) per manufacturer’s protocol at a final concentration of 5µM dATP. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase was subsequently terminated by heating to 70°C for 15 minutes. Two percent of the total volume of each poly-adenylation reaction was then used for primary amplification using D1 and T17-UNIV primers. Conditions were 95°C for 5 minutes followed by 15 cycles of 95°C for 1 minute, 57°C for 45 seconds, and 72°C for 45 seconds and then a final 5 minute extension step at 72°C. Two percent by volume of each primary amplification reaction was then serially diluted 5-fold in water. One µl of the original primary reaction and of each serial dilution were used as template for a secondary amplification step using primers D2 and UNIV-BglII. Reaction conditions were the same as for the primary reactions, but the total number of cycles was increased to 30 cycles total. 15µl of each secondary reaction was run out on a 1% agarose TBE gel and then transferred onto Zeta-Probe GT membrane (Bio-Rad). The membrane was subsequently hybridized with 32P-labeled DS850 oligonucleotide. For IL-2 loading control PCR reactions, aliquots of the DNA samples used for poly-adenylation were serially diluted 5-fold and amplified as previously described[30]. 10µL of each PCR product was run out on a 1% agarose TBE gel and then transferred overnight onto Zeta-Probe GT membrane (Bio-Rad). The oligonucleotides D1, D2, UNIV-BglII, T17-UNIV and DS850 are listed in Supplementary Table 4.

TUNEL staining

Thymi were fixed in buffered 10% formalin, and paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Apoptotic nuclei were detected with TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick labeling.
  30 in total

1.  Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX.

Authors:  Arkady Celeste; Simone Petersen; Peter J Romanienko; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Hua Tang Chen; Olga A Sedelnikova; Bernardo Reina-San-Martin; Vincenzo Coppola; Eric Meffre; Michael J Difilippantonio; Christophe Redon; Duane R Pilch; Alexandru Olaru; Michael Eckhaus; R Daniel Camerini-Otero; Lino Tessarollo; Ferenc Livak; Katia Manova; William M Bonner; Michel C Nussenzweig; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  ATM stabilizes DNA double-strand-break complexes during V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Andrea L Bredemeyer; Girdhar G Sharma; Ching-Yu Huang; Beth A Helmink; Laura M Walker; Katrina C Khor; Beth Nuskey; Kathleen E Sullivan; Tej K Pandita; Craig H Bassing; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  gammaH2AX and MDC1: anchoring the DNA-damage-response machinery to broken chromosomes.

Authors:  Manuel Stucki; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-03-10

4.  ATM prevents the persistence and propagation of chromosome breaks in lymphocytes.

Authors:  Elsa Callén; Mila Jankovic; Simone Difilippantonio; Jeremy A Daniel; Hua-Tang Chen; Arkady Celeste; Manuela Pellegrini; Kevin McBride; Danny Wangsa; Andrea L Bredemeyer; Barry P Sleckman; Thomas Ried; Michel Nussenzweig; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The 3D structure of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus: implications for long-range genomic interactions.

Authors:  Suchit Jhunjhunwala; Menno C van Zelm; Mandy M Peak; Steve Cutchin; Roy Riblet; Jacques J M van Dongen; Frank G Grosveld; Tobias A Knoch; Cornelis Murre
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Enhanced intra-switch region recombination during immunoglobulin class switch recombination in 53BP1-/- B cells.

Authors:  Bernardo Reina-San-Martin; Junjie Chen; André Nussenzweig; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Developmental stage-specific regulation of TCR-alpha-chain gene assembly by intrinsic features of the TEA promoter.

Authors:  Ching-Yu Huang; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  ATM deficiency disrupts Tcra locus integrity and the maturation of CD4+CD8+ thymocytes.

Authors:  Irina R Matei; Rebecca A Gladdy; Lauryl M J Nutter; Angelo Canty; Cynthia J Guidos; Jayne S Danska
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Defects in coding joint formation in vivo in developing ATM-deficient B and T lymphocytes.

Authors:  Ching-Yu Huang; Girdhar G Sharma; Laura M Walker; Craig H Bassing; Tej K Pandita; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Distinct domains in Nbs1 regulate irradiation-induced checkpoints and apoptosis.

Authors:  Simone Difilippantonio; Arkady Celeste; Michael J Kruhlak; Youngsoo Lee; Michael J Difilippantonio; Lionel Feigenbaum; Stephen P Jackson; Peter J McKinnon; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  178 in total

Review 1.  Origin of chromosomal translocations in lymphoid cancer.

Authors:  André Nussenzweig; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  TopBP1 functions with 53BP1 in the G1 DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Rachele Cescutti; Simona Negrini; Masaoki Kohzaki; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Functional redundancy between repair factor XLF and damage response mediator 53BP1 in V(D)J recombination and DNA repair.

Authors:  Valentyn Oksenych; Frederick W Alt; Vipul Kumar; Bjoern Schwer; Duane R Wesemann; Erica Hansen; Harin Patel; Arthur Su; Chunguang Guo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus.

Authors:  Stephanie Panier; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 5.  Role of 53BP1 in the regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Clayton R Hunt; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Raj K Pandita; John Yordy; Deepti B Ramnarain; Nobuo Horikoshi; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Protein phosphatase 5 regulates the function of 53BP1 after neocarzinostatin-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Yoonsung Kang; Jung-Hee Lee; Nguyen Ngoc Hoan; Hong-Moon Sohn; In-Youb Chang; Ho Jin You
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Replication stress induces genome-wide copy number changes in human cells that resemble polymorphic and pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Martin F Arlt; Jennifer G Mulle; Valerie M Schaibley; Ryan L Ragland; Sandra G Durkin; Stephen T Warren; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Peripheral subnuclear positioning suppresses Tcrb recombination and segregates Tcrb alleles from RAG2.

Authors:  Elizabeth A W Chan; Grace Teng; Elizabeth Corbett; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Craig H Bassing; David G Schatz; Michael S Krangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair.

Authors:  Michal Zimmermann; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 20.808

10.  The ATM Kinase Restrains Joining of Both VDJ Signal and Coding Ends.

Authors:  Katheryn Meek; Yao Xu; Caleb Bailie; Kefei Yu; Jessica A Neal
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.