Literature DB >> 16009723

Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1.

Simon Bekker-Jensen1, Claudia Lukas, Fredrik Melander, Jiri Bartek, Jiri Lukas.   

Abstract

53BP1 is a key component of the genome surveillance network activated by DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Despite its known accumulation at the DSB sites, the spatiotemporal aspects of 53BP1 interaction with DSBs and the role of other DSB regulators in this process remain unclear. Here, we used real-time microscopy to study the DSB-induced redistribution of 53BP1 in living cells. We show that within minutes after DNA damage, 53BP1 becomes progressively, yet transiently, immobilized around the DSB-flanking chromatin. Quantitative imaging of single cells revealed that the assembly of 53BP1 at DSBs significantly lagged behind Mdc1/NFBD1, another DSB-interacting checkpoint mediator. Furthermore, short interfering RNA-mediated ablation of Mdc1/NFBD1 drastically impaired 53BP1 redistribution to DSBs and triggered premature dissociation of 53BP1 from these regions. Collectively, these in vivo measurements identify Mdc1/NFBD1 as a key upstream determinant of 53BP1's interaction with DSBs from its dynamic assembly at the DSB sites through sustained retention within the DSB-flanking chromatin up to the recovery from the checkpoint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16009723      PMCID: PMC2171401          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200503043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  48 in total

1.  Phosphorylation and rapid relocalization of 53BP1 to nuclear foci upon DNA damage.

Authors:  L Anderson; C Henderson; Y Adachi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling.

Authors:  Damien D'Amours; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints.

Authors:  Kara A Nyberg; Rhett J Michelson; Charles W Putnam; Ted A Weinert
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 16.830

4.  53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Shuhei Matsuoka; Phillip B Carpenter; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Jeroen Essers; Adriaan B Houtsmuller; Lieneke van Veelen; Coen Paulusma; Alex L Nigg; Albert Pastink; Wim Vermeulen; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  The DNA damage-dependent intra-S phase checkpoint is regulated by parallel pathways.

Authors:  Jacob Falck; John H J Petrini; Bret R Williams; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage.

Authors:  Jacob Falck; Julia Coates; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Kinetochore localisation of the DNA damage response component 53BP1 during mitosis.

Authors:  Denis Jullien; Paola Vagnarelli; William C Earnshaw; Yasuhisa Adachi
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Rad51 accumulation at sites of DNA damage and in postreplicative chromatin.

Authors:  S Tashiro; J Walter; A Shinohara; N Kamada; T Cremer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is an early participant in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  L B Schultz; N H Chehab; A Malikzay; T D Halazonetis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12-25       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  127 in total

1.  Nuclear proteins: finding and binding target sites in chromatin.

Authors:  Martin E van Royen; Angelika Zotter; Shehu M Ibrahim; Bart Geverts; Adriaan B Houtsmuller
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  DNA damage response.

Authors:  Giuseppina Giglia-Mari; Angelika Zotter; Wim Vermeulen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  H2AX chromatin structures and their response to DNA damage revealed by 4Pi microscopy.

Authors:  Jörg Bewersdorf; Brian T Bennett; Kendall L Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Imaging of protein movement induced by chromosomal breakage: tiny 'local' lesions pose great 'global' challenges.

Authors:  Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Histone modification-dependent and -independent pathways for recruitment of checkpoint protein Crb2 to double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Li-Lin Du; Toru M Nakamura; Paul Russell
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Claspin operates downstream of TopBP1 to direct ATR signaling towards Chk1 activation.

Authors:  Shizhou Liu; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Niels Mailand; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus.

Authors:  Stephanie Panier; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  S-S synapsis during class switch recombination is promoted by distantly located transcriptional elements and activation-induced deaminase.

Authors:  Robert Wuerffel; Lili Wang; Fernando Grigera; John Manis; Erik Selsing; Thomas Perlot; Frederick W Alt; Michel Cogne; Eric Pinaud; Amy L Kenter
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 31.745

9.  Single-cell and subcellular pharmacokinetic imaging allows insight into drug action in vivo.

Authors:  Greg M Thurber; Katy S Yang; Thomas Reiner; Rainer H Kohler; Peter Sorger; Tim Mitchison; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Quantitative live cell imaging reveals a gradual shift between DNA repair mechanisms and a maximal use of HR in mid S phase.

Authors:  Ketki Karanam; Ran Kafri; Alexander Loewer; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.