Literature DB >> 18930327

The clinical feasibility and effect of online cone beam computer tomography-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer.

Jin Wang1, Sen Bai, Nianyong Chen, Feng Xu, Xiaoqin Jiang, Yan Li, Qingfeng Xu, Yali Shen, Hong Zhang, Youling Gong, Renming Zhong, Qingfeng Jiang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Online adaptive correction in image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy appeared to be a promising approach for precision radiation treatment in head and neck tumors. This protocol was designed to evaluate the clinical feasibility and effect of online cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) guidance in IMRT of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Elekta Synergy system, which integrates an X-ray volumetric imager (XVI), was used to deliver radiation treatment for 22 cases of NPC. The acquired CBCT was registered to the planning CT for online and offline analysis. The systematic and random setup errors, as well as planning target volume (PTV) margin, were calculated at different correction threshold levels. The impact of online setup correction on dosimetry was evaluated by simulation of pre-correction errors.
RESULTS: The correction-of-setup-errors frequencies for 1, 2 and 3mm thresholds were 41.3-53.9%, 12.7-21.2% and 6.3-10.3%, respectively. Online correction was effective at the 2mm threshold level for all three axes. The pre-correction systematic errors for the whole group ranged 1.1-1.3mm, and the random errors were also 1.1-1.3mm. After online correction, the systematic and random errors ranged 0.4-0.5mm and 0.7-0.8mm, respectively, in the three directions. The PTV margins for the pre-correction, pretreatment and post-treatment positions were 3.5-4.2mm, 1.6-1.8mm and 2.5-3.2mm, respectively, in three directions. Analysis of hypothetical dosimetric change due to a translational isocenter shift of 3mm showed that if no correction was applied, the mean maximum dose to both the brain stem and spinal cord would be increased by 10Gy, the mean dose to the left and right parotids would be increased by 7.8 and 8.5Gy, respectively, and the dose to target volumes would be decreased: 4Gy for 95% GTV and 5.6Gy for 95% CTV(60.)
CONCLUSIONS: CBCT-based online correction increased the accuracy of IMRT for NPC and reduced irradiated margins, by decreasing both the systematic and random errors. Online CBCT correction reduces the radiation dose to normal tissue and creates room for further dose escalation of tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18930327     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  32 in total

1.  The dosimetric comparison of the radiotherapeutic plans between composite and synchronous planning approaches in sequential IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Gang Zhou; Yanze Sun; Jianjun Qian; Ye Tian; Xueguan Lu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Relationships between genetic polymorphisms in inflammation-related factor gene and the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Yan-Li Qu; Hong Yu; Yan-Zhi Chen; Yu-Xia Zhao; Guang-Jun Chen; Lu Bai; Dan Liu; Hong-Xin Su; He-Tong Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-06-22

3.  Set-up errors and planning target volume margins in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a clinical study of image guidance with on-line cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Francesco Dionisi; Mauro Filippo Palazzi; Francesco Bracco; Maria Grazia Brambilla; Claudia Carbonini; Diego Dario Asnaghi; Angelo Filippo Monti; Alberto Torresin
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Anisotropic margin expansions in 6 anatomic directions for oropharyngeal image guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Adam D Yock; Adam S Garden; Laurence E Court; Beth M Beadle; Lifei Zhang; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Algorithm-enabled exploration of image-quality potential of cone-beam CT in image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xiao Han; Erik Pearson; Charles Pelizzari; Hania Al-Hallaq; Emil Y Sidky; Junguo Bian; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Shrikant Balasaheb Mali
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-02-22

7.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer implementing molecular imaging with 18F-choline PET-CT to define a simultaneous integrated boost.

Authors:  Michael Pinkawa; Richard Holy; Marc D Piroth; Jens Klotz; Sandra Nussen; Thomas Krohn; Felix M Mottaghy; Martin Weibrecht; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Impact of residual and intrafractional errors on strategy of correction for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Gang Cai; Wei-Gang Hu; Jia-Yi Chen; Xiao-Li Yu; Zi-Qiang Pan; Zhao-Zhi Yang; Xiao-Mao Guo; Zhi-Min Shao; Guo-Liang Jiang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Accurate positioning for head and neck cancer patients using 2D and 3D image guidance.

Authors:  Hyejoo Kang; Dale M Lovelock; Ellen D Yorke; Sergey Kriminski; Nancy Lee; Howard I Amols
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Recent advances in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Sameer K Nath; Daniel R Simpson; Brent S Rose; Ajay P Sandhu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.