| Literature DB >> 18928526 |
Klaus J Petzke1, Susanne Klaus.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Macronutrient composition of diets can influence energy balance in humans. We tested the hypothesis whether low protein content in single meals may induce lower values of energy expenditure (EE) and fat oxidation (FO) as compared to adequate protein content.Entities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18928526 PMCID: PMC2576278 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-5-25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
General characteristics of the study participants
| Mean (n = 6) ± SD | |
| Age (y) | 25.5 ± 2.6 |
| Weight (kg) | 59.8 ± 8.3 |
| Height (m) | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.6 ± 2.5 |
| Baseline δ13C in breath CO2 [‰ vs. PDB] | -25.8 ± 0.7 |
Composition and sources of test meals
| Test meal | LP | AP | δ13C [‰ vs. PDB]5 | |
| Skimmed milk powder1 | (g) | 20 | 60 | -28.2 ± 0.7 |
| (kJ) | 297 | 895 | ||
| Corn oil2 | (g) | 50 | 50 | -16.1 ± 0.2 |
| (kJ) | 1881 | 1881 | ||
| Wheat starch3 | (g) | 40 | 0 | -26.9 ± 0.2 |
| (kJ) | 581 | 0 | ||
| Saccharose4 | (g) | 20 | 20 | -27.8 ± 0.2 |
| (kJ) | 334 | 334 |
11492 kJ/100 g, Naturaflor®, Töpfer GmbH, Dietmannsried, Germany
23762 kJ/100 g, Mazola®, Unilever Deutschland, Hamburg, Germany
31450 kJ/100 g, Weizella, Hermann Kröner Weizenstärkefabrik, Ibbenbüren, Germany
41668 kJ/100 g, Zucker, Nordzucker, Braunschweig, Germany
5Data are mean values ± SD, n = 5 measurements.
Macronutrient composition of test meals1
| Test meal | LP | AP |
| Energy content (kJ) | 3114 | 3131 |
| Protein (g) | 7.2 | 21.0 |
| Protein (kJ) | 121 | 357 |
| Protein (% total energy) | 3.9 | 11.4 |
| Total fat (g) | 50.2 | 50.6 |
| Total fat (kJ) | 1890 | 1903 |
| Total fat (% total energy) | 60.7 | 60.8 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 64.9 | 51.6 |
| Carbohydrate (kJ) | 1102 | 872 |
| Carbohydrate (% total energy) | 35.4 | 27.8 |
1Based on calculations using [Food Composition and Nutrition Tables, 5th revised and completed version, compiles by Schertz H and Senser F, medpharm Scientific Publishers, Stuttgart, 1994]
Baseline measurements before ingestion of test meals (n = 6)
| Test meal | LP | AP |
| EE (kJ/h) | 218 ± 12 | 230 ± 13 |
| RQ | 0.87 ± 0.04 | 0.86 ± 0.08 |
| PO (g/h) | 2.73 ± 0.66 | 2.73 ± 0.66 |
| FO (g/h) | 2.72 ± 1.53 | 3.05 ± 2.53 |
| CHO (g/h) | 10.7 ± 2.9 | 8.65 ± 4.41 |
The influence of the test meals on postprandial energy expenditure and substrate oxidation (n = 6)
| Test meal | LP | AP | p < |
| Postprandial EE (kJ/6 h) | 1356 ± 69 | 1516 ± 66 | 0.01 |
| DIT (kJ/6 h)1 | 46.5 ± 5.7 | 134.6 ± 34.3 | 0.001 |
| DIT (%) | 9.0 ± 1.1 | 25.9 ± 6.6 | 0.001 |
| RQ | 0.87 ± 0.04 | 0.87 ± 0.03 | ns4 |
| Change in RQ | -0.01 ± 0.06 | 0.01 ± 0.05 | ns |
| Postprandial PO (g/6 h) | 14.9 ± 4.20 | 18.0 ± 4.2 | ns |
| Change in PO (g/6 h)1 | -1.50 ± 1.23 | 1.55 ± 1.29 | 0.001 |
| Postprandial CO (g/6 h) | 55.6 ± 17.8 | 58.7 ± 14.1 | ns |
| Change in CO (g/6 h)1 | -8.70 ± 27.65 | 6.77 ± 25.34 | ns |
| Postprandial FO (g/6 h) | 16.9 ± 7.5 | 16.8 ± 8.8 | ns |
| Change in FO (g/6 h)1 | 0.55 ± 7.91 | -1.50 ± 7.00 | ns |
| Endogenous postprandial FO (g/6 h)2 | 12.6 ± 7.8 | 14.9 ± 9.2 | ns |
| Exogenous postprandial FO (g/6 h)3 | 4.28 ± 1.57 | 1.87 ± 1.00 | 0.01 |
| Contribution of exogenous postprandial FO of energy expenditure (kJ/6 h; % of postprandial EE) | 169; 12 | 74; 5 |
1Calculated as sum of postprandial values over 6 h – (fasting value per h × 6).
2Calculated as exogenous FO – postprandial FO.
3Based on 13CO2 breath test.
4ns = p > 0.05.
Figure 1Delta value over baseline (DOB) of breath Data are means ± SD, n = 6. Values with indications are significantly different (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). For meal composition and details, see method section.
Figure 2Cumulative exogenous fat oxidation (FO) of young woman after ingestion of test meals with either 3.9% (LP) or 11.4% (AP) of energy as protein and with naturally enriched corn oil as Data are means ± SD, n = 6. Values with indications are significantly different (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). For meal composition and details, see method section.