Literature DB >> 18926987

Is attention needed for word identification? Evidence from the Stroop paradigm.

Joel Lachter1, Eric Ruthruff, Mei-Ching Lien, Robert S McCann.   

Abstract

One of the most robust findings in attention research is that the time to name a color is lengthened markedly in the presence of an irrelevant word that spells a different color name: the Stroop effect. The Stroop effect is found even when the word is physically separated from the color, apparently indicating that words can be read outside the focus of spatial attention. The present study critically evaluated this claim. We employed several stringent measures within a Stroop paradigm to prevent participants from attending to the irrelevant words (e.g., limiting exposure duration to prevent attention capture). Nonetheless, residual Stroop effects were obtained for both color words and semantic associates (e.g., sky to blue). These data suggest that lexical processing can sometimes occur outside the focus of spatial attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18926987     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

2.  What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

3.  The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.

Authors:  R S McCann; C L Folk; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention.

Authors:  Joel Lachter; Kenneth I Forster; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Eric Ruthruff; Logan Cornett; Zachary Goodin; Philip A Allen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Automaticity and word perception: evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects.

Authors:  T L Brown; L Roos-Gilbert; T H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Evidence against early selection: stimulus quality effects in previewed displays.

Authors:  P Fera; P Jolicoeur; D Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  8 in total

1.  Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jong Moon Choi; Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

2.  Conflict resolved: On the role of spatial attention in reading and color naming tasks.

Authors:  Serje Robidoux; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

3.  Multiple routes to word recognition: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Philip A Allen; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-17

4.  Viewing-position effects in the Stroop task: Initial fixation position modulates Stroop effects in fully colored words.

Authors:  Patrick Perret; Stéphanie Ducrot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

5.  Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension.

Authors:  Ryan J Hubbard; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.610

6.  Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.

Authors:  Ludovic Ferrand; Maria Augustinova
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

7.  Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics.

Authors:  Elsa M Labuschagne; Derek Besner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-10

8.  Spatial attention in written word perception.

Authors:  Veronica Montani; Andrea Facoetti; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.