Literature DB >> 18923984

Variation in preferred gain with experience for hearing-aid users.

Gitte Keidser1, Anna O'Brien, Lyndal Carter, Margot McLelland, Ingrid Yeend.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether gain adaptation occurs, and at which frequency bands, among new hearing aid (HA) users. Fifty new and 26 experienced HA users were fitted with three listening programs (NAL-NL1 and NAL-NL1 with low- and high-frequency cuts) in the same hearing instrument family. Real-life gain preferences and comfortable loudness levels were measured one, four, and 13 months post-fitting for the new HA users, and one month post-fitting for the experienced HA users. Relative to experienced HA users, new HA users preferred progressively less overall gain than prescribed as the hearing loss became more severe. Gain adaptation occurred in new HA users with greater hearing loss, but was not complete 13 months post-fitting, and was not explained by changes in loudness perception. Preferences for a high-frequency gain cut by half of all study participants could not be predicted from audiological data. Gain adaptation management is recommended for new HA users with more than a mild hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18923984     DOI: 10.1080/14992020802178722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  8 in total

1.  Audiologist-driven versus patient-driven fine tuning of hearing instruments.

Authors:  Monique Boymans; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-12-04

Review 2.  Evidence on self-fitting hearing aids.

Authors:  Lena L N Wong
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-04-23

3.  Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness.

Authors:  Katie M Thrailkill; Marc A Brennan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 5.  NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lyndal Carter; Anna O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-30

6.  A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.

Authors:  Carol Mackersie; Arthur Boothroyd; Alexandra Lithgow
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Peter T Johannesen; Patricia Pérez-González; José L Blanco; Sridhar Kalluri; Brent Edwards
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure.

Authors:  G Keidser; H Dillon; M Flax; T Ching; S Brewer
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2011-03-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.