Literature DB >> 29894379

A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.

Carol Mackersie1, Arthur Boothroyd1,2, Alexandra Lithgow1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine self-adjusted output response and speech intelligibility index (SII) in individuals with mild to moderate hearing loss and to measure the effects of prior hearing aid experience.
DESIGN: Thirteen hearing aid users and 13 nonusers, with similar group-mean pure-tone thresholds, listened to prerecorded and preprocessed sentences spoken by a man. Starting with a generic level and spectrum, participants adjusted (1) overall level, (2) high-frequency boost, and (3) low-frequency cut. Participants took a speech perception test after an initial adjustment before making a final adjustment. The three self-selected parameters, along with individual thresholds and real-ear-to-coupler differences, were used to compute output levels and SIIs for the starting and two self-adjusted conditions. The values were compared with an NAL second nonlinear threshold-based prescription (NAL-NL2) and, for the hearing aid users, performance of their existing hearing aids.
RESULTS: All participants were able to complete the self-adjustment process. The generic starting condition provided outputs (between 2 and 8 kHz) and SIIs that were significantly below those prescribed by NAL-NL2. Both groups increased SII to values that were not significantly different from prescription. The hearing aid users, but not the nonusers, increased high-frequency output and SII significantly after taking the speech perception test. Seventeen of the 26 participants (65%) met an SII criterion of 60% under the generic starting condition. The proportion increased to 23 out of 26 (88%) after the final self-adjustment. Of the 13 hearing aid users, 8 (62%) met the 60% criterion with their existing hearing aids. With the final self-adjustment, 12 out of 13 (92%) met this criterion.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the conclusion that user self-adjustment of basic amplification characteristics can be both feasible and effective with or without prior hearing aid experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29894379      PMCID: PMC6289875          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  17 in total

1.  A self-fitting hearing aid: need and concept.

Authors:  Elizabeth Convery; Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lisa Hartley
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-12-04

2.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: the effect of different control configurations.

Authors:  Wouter A Dreschler; Gitte Keidser; Elizabeth Convery; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effect of initial setting on convergence to optimal hearing aid setting using a simplex method.

Authors:  F K Kuk; C Lau
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1995-10

5.  An evaluation of three adaptive hearing aid selection strategies.

Authors:  A C Neuman; H Levitt; R Mills; T Schwander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relative satisfaction for frequency responses selected with a simplex procedure in different listening conditions.

Authors:  F K Kuk; N M Pape
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-02

7.  Evaluation of the Self-Fitting Process with a Commercially Available Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Elizabeth Convery; Gitte Keidser; Mark Seeto; Margot McLelland
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids.

Authors:  G Keidser
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Factors affecting reliability and validity of self-directed automatic in situ audiometry: implications for self-fitting hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Elizabeth Convery; Gitte Keidser; Mark Seeto; Ingrid Yeend; Katrina Freeston
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Ruth A Bentler; Patricia A Roush
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  10 in total

1.  Open Speech Platform: Democratizing Hearing Aid Research.

Authors:  Dhiman Sengupta; Arthur Boothroyd; Tamara Zubatiy; Cagri Yalcin; Dezhi Hong; Sean K Hamilton; Rajesh Gupta; Harinath Garudadri
Journal:  Int Conf Pervasive Comput Technol Healthc       Date:  2020-05

2.  Amplification Self-Adjustment: Controls and Repeatability.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd; Jennifer Retana; Carol L Mackersie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  A Wearable, Extensible, Open-Source Platform for Hearing Healthcare Research.

Authors:  Louis Pisha; Julian Warchall; Tamara Zubatiy; Sean Hamilton; Ching-Hua Lee; Ganz Chockalingam; Patrick P Mercier; Rajesh Gupta; Bhaskar D Rao; Harinath Garudadri
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Common Configurations of Real-Ear Aided Response Targets Prescribed by NAL-NL2 for Older Adults With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Justin Jensen; Dhruv Vyas; Dana Urbanski; Harinath Garudadri; Octav Chipara; Yu-Hsiang Wu
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Hearing Aid Self-Adjustment: Effects of Formal Speech-Perception Test and Noise.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; Arthur Boothroyd; Harinath Garudadri
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large Between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Trevor T Perry; Melanie Gregan; Dianne VanTasell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Perceptual Effects of Adjusting Hearing-Aid Gain by Means of a Machine-Learning Approach Based on Individual User Preference.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Ole Hau; Jens Brehm Bagger Nielsen; Thor Bundgaard Nielsen; Søren Vase Legarth
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Dianne J Van Tasell; Bill Rabinowitz; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Feasibility of hearing aid gain self-adjustment using speech recognition.

Authors:  Donghyeon Yun; Yi Shen; Zhuohuang Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Korea       Date:  2022-01-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.