Literature DB >> 1474227

Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.

B C Moore1, A Sek.   

Abstract

This article is concerned with the detection of mixed modulation (MM), i.e., simultaneously occurring amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM). In experiment 1, an adaptive two-alternative forced-choice task was used to determine thresholds for detecting AM alone. Then, thresholds for detecting FM were determined for stimuli which had a fixed amount of AM in the signal interval only. The amount of AM was always less than the threshold for detecting AM alone. The FM thresholds depended significantly on the magnitude of the coexisting AM. For low modulation rates (4, 16, and 64 Hz), the FM thresholds did not depend significantly on the relative phase of modulation for the FM and AM. For a high modulation rate (256 Hz) strong effects of modulator phase were observed. These phase effects are as predicted by the model proposed by Hartmann and Hnath [Acustica 50, 297-312 (1982)], which assumes that detection of modulation at modulation frequencies higher than the critical modulation frequency is based on detection of the lower sideband in the modulated signal's spectrum. In the second experiment, psychometric functions were measured for the detection of AM alone and FM alone, using modulation rates of 4 and 16 Hz. Results showed that, for each type of modulation, d' is approximately a linear function of the square of the modulation index. Application of this finding to the results of experiment 1 suggested that, at low modulation rates, FM and AM are not detected by completely independent mechanisms. In the third experiment, psychometric functions were again measured for the detection of AM alone and FM alone, using a 10-Hz modulation rate. Detectability was then measured for combined AM and FM, with modulation depths selected so that each type of modulation would be equally detectable if presented alone. Significant effects of relative modulator phase were found when detectability was relatively high. These effects were not correctly predicted by either a single-band excitation-pattern model or a multiple-band excitation-pattern model. However, the detectability of the combined AM and FM was better than would be predicted if the two types of modulation were coded completely independently.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1474227     DOI: 10.1121/1.404208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.

Authors:  Jessica J Messersmith; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the mechanisms involved in the recovery of envelope information from temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Rebecca E Millman; Neal F Viemeister; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Assessing the Role of Place and Timing Cues in Coding Frequency and Amplitude Modulation as a Function of Age.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-20

5.  Auditory deficits in amusia extend beyond poor pitch perception.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Forward masking of frequency modulation.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation in logarithmic frequency sweeps across wide regions of the spectrum.

Authors:  I-Hui Hsieh; Kourosh Saberi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15

9.  Dissociable neural response signatures for slow amplitude and frequency modulation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Molly J Henry; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Discrimination of rippled-spectrum patterns in noise: A manifestation of compressive nonlinearity.

Authors:  Olga N Milekhina; Dmitry I Nechaev; Vladimir O Klishin; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.