Literature DB >> 18850217

Ethical issues raised by personalized nutrition based on genetic information.

Ulf Görman1.   

Abstract

Four principles are taken as basis for the ethical analysis: autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. Health is understood as a limited aspect of wellbeing. Food is understood as an important aspect of wellbeing, not only an instrument for health. Modern society is characterized by a tendency to identify wellbeing with external rather than subjective circumstances, to identify wellbeing with health, and to create exaggerated health expectations. Based upon this understanding, aspects of personalized nutrition are discussed: genetic testing, counselling, and development of special dietary products. Today the predictive value of genetic tests for personal nutrition is limited, and experimental at best. Recommendations for the future: Personalized nutrition must be based on solid knowledge. Phenotypic analyses should be used when adequate. When a genetic test can have a clear advantage, this should be preferred. Opportunistic screening should only be used when clearly beneficial. Specially trained persons should collect information from genetic tests and carry through councelling on a personal basis. Marketing of genetic tests directly sold to the public should be discouraged. Development of special products for personalized nutrition may be necessary in some cases. However, this may also lead to a medicalization of diet.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 18850217      PMCID: PMC3454816          DOI: 10.1007/BF02829932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Nutr        ISSN: 1555-8932            Impact factor:   5.523


  9 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  'Health for me': a sociocultural analysis of healthism in the middle classes.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Simon Wessely
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Phenylketonuria: old disease, new approach to treatment.

Authors:  H L Levy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A randomised controlled trial of anti-smoking advice: 10-year results.

Authors:  G Rose; P J Hamilton; L Colwell; M J Shipley
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life.

Authors:  R Crawford
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.663

6.  Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women.

Authors:  G A Colditz; W C Willett; A Rotnitzky; J E Manson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Are variants in the CAPN10 gene related to risk of type 2 diabetes? A quantitative assessment of population and family-based association studies.

Authors:  Yiqing Song; Tianhua Niu; JoAnn E Manson; David J Kwiatkowski; Simin Liu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Genetics and epidemiology of adult-type hypolactasia.

Authors:  T Sahi
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1994

Review 9.  Diet, genes and disease: implications for nutrition policy.

Authors:  Michael J Gibney; Eileen R Gibney
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.297

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  The challenges for molecular nutrition research 1: linking genotype to healthy nutrition.

Authors:  Christine M Williams; Jose M Ordovas; Dennis Lairon; John Hesketh; Georg Lietz; Mike Gibney; Ben van Ommen
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.523

2.  Risks of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics? What the scientists say.

Authors:  T Hurlimann; V Menuz; J Graham; J Robitaille; M-C Vohl; B Godard
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 5.523

3.  Editorial.

Authors:  U Görman
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.523

4.  Values at stake: autonomy, responsibility, and trustworthiness in relation to genetic testing and personalized nutrition advice.

Authors:  Karin Nordström; Niklas Juth; Sofia Kjellström; Franck L B Meijboom; Ulf Görman
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 5.523

5.  Food and health: individual, cultural, or scientific matters?

Authors:  Karin Nordström; Christian Coff; Håkan Jönsson; Lennart Nordenfelt; Ulf Görman
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.523

6.  Do we know enough? A scientific and ethical analysis of the basis for genetic-based personalized nutrition.

Authors:  Ulf Görman; John C Mathers; Keith A Grimaldi; Jennie Ahlgren; Karin Nordström
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 5.523

7.  Genetic test for the prescription of diets in support of physical activity.

Authors:  Zakira Naureen; Giacinto Abele Donato Miggiano; Barbara Aquilanti; Valeria Velluti; Giuseppina Matera; Lucilla Gagliardi; Alessandra Zulian; Roberta Romanelli; Matteo Bertelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-11-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.