Literature DB >> 18847574

Discontinuation and resumption of contraceptive use: results from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Barbara Vaughan1, James Trussell, Kathryn Kost, Susheela Singh, Rachel Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discontinuation of contraceptive use that is not immediately followed by resumption of use of another method while a woman is at risk is a common cause of unintended pregnancy. STUDY
DESIGN: We provide new estimates of discontinuation for the pill, injectable, male condom, withdrawal and fertility-awareness-based methods, and identify socioeconomic characteristics associated with discontinuation for the pill, male condom and withdrawal. We provide new estimates of resumption of use by prior method used and identify socioeconomic characteristics associated with resumption of use. Estimates are obtained using the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, supplemented by the 2001 Abortion Patient Survey to correct for underreporting of abortion.
RESULTS: The fraction of method use segments discontinued for method-related reasons within 1 year was highest for the male condom (57%), withdrawal (54%) and fertility-awareness-based methods (53%), and lowest for the pill (33%), with the injectable in-between (44%). However, contraception was abandoned altogether in only 25% of cases. The probability of resuming use of a contraceptive was 72% in the initial month of exposure to the risk of an unintended pregnancy; this rose to 76% by the third month.
CONCLUSION: The risk of discontinuation of use of reversible methods of contraception for method-related reasons, including a change of method, is very high, but fortunately the risk of abandoning use of contraception altogether is far lower, and most spells of exposure to risk of an unintended pregnancy following discontinuation are protected from the start by a switch to another method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18847574      PMCID: PMC2800035          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  9 in total

1.  Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use: results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  J Trussell; B Vaughan
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

2.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-06

3.  Factors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, United States, 2004.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost; Susheela Singh; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2007-06

4.  Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002.

Authors:  William D Mosher; Gladys M Martinez; Anjani Chandra; Joyce C Abma; Stephanie J Willson
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2004-12-10

5.  Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost; Jacqueline E Darroch
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2008-06

6.  Contraceptive failure in the United States: estimates from the 1982 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  W R Grady; M D Hayward; J Yagi
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct

7.  Underreporting of induced and spontaneous abortion in the United States: an analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Kathryn Kost
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2007-09

8.  Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Kathryn Kost; Susheela Singh; Barbara Vaughan; James Trussell; Akinrinola Bankole
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total
  52 in total

1.  Predictors of contraceptive switching and discontinuation within the first 6 months of use among Highly Effective Reversible Contraceptive Initiative Salt Lake study participants.

Authors:  Rebecca G Simmons; Jessica N Sanders; Claudia Geist; Lori Gawron; Kyl Myers; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Characteristics associated with suppression of spermatogenesis in a male hormonal contraceptive trial using testosterone and Nestorone(®) gels.

Authors:  M Y Roth; N Ilani; C Wang; S T Page; W J Bremner; R S Swerdloff; C Dart; R Sitruk-Ware; N Kumar; D Blithe; J K Amory
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.842

3.  Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Laura Stratton; Tina R Raine; Kirsten Thompson; Jillian T Henderson; Maya Blum; Debbie Postlethwaite; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 4.  Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Colleen Krajewski; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  Bringing patients' social context into the examination room: an investigation of the discussion of social influence during contraceptive counseling.

Authors:  Kira Levy; Alexandra M Minnis; Maureen Lahiff; Julie Schmittdiel; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014-12-07

6.  Ensuring our research reflects our values: The role of family planning research in advancing reproductive autonomy.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Reiley Reed; Edith Fox; Dominika Seidman; Cara Hall; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Prospective study of weight change in new adolescent users of DMPA, NET-EN, COCs, nonusers and discontinuers of hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Mags E Beksinska; Jenni A Smit; Immo Kleinschmidt; Cecilia Milford; Timothy M M Farley
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Black-White Differences in Sex and Contraceptive Use Among Young Women.

Authors:  Yasamin Kusunoki; Jennifer S Barber; Elizabeth J Ela; Amelia Bucek
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2016-10

9.  Effect of prospectively measured pregnancy intentions on the consistency of contraceptive use among young women in Michigan.

Authors:  C Moreau; K Hall; J Trussell; J Barber
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Using Longitudinal Data to Understand Changes in Consistent Contraceptive Use.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Athena Tapales; Laura D Lindberg; Jennifer Frost
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.