Literature DB >> 17933292

Underreporting of induced and spontaneous abortion in the United States: an analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Rachel K Jones1, Kathryn Kost.   

Abstract

Underreporting of induced abortions in surveys is widespread, both in countries where the procedure is illegal or highly restricted and in those where it is legal. In this study, we find that fewer than one half of induced abortions performed in the United States in 1997-2001 (47 percent) were reported by women during face-to-face interviews in the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Hispanic and black women and those with low income were among the least likely to report their experience of abortion. Women were also less likely to report abortions that occurred when they were in their 20s. Second-trimester abortions were more likely to be reported than first-trimester terminations. The levels of recent spontaneous abortion reported in the 2002 NSFG were consistent with the accumulated body of clinical research, although substantially more lifetime pregnancy losses were reported on self-administered surveys than in face-to-face interviews. Subsequent research should explore strategies to improve information collected on abortion, and, in the interim, research involving pregnancy outcomes should be adjusted for unreported induced abortions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17933292     DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00130.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Fam Plann        ISSN: 0039-3665


  80 in total

1.  Female perceptions of male versus female intendedness at the time of teenage pregnancy.

Authors:  Emily R Clear; Corrine M Williams; Richard A Crosby
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-12

2.  Race-Ethnic Differences in the Non-marital Fertility Rates in 2006-2010.

Authors:  Yujin Kim; R Kelly Raley
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2014-08-08

3.  Pregnancy intention and use of contraception among Hispanic women in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010.

Authors:  Lisa M Masinter; Joe Feinglass; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Social disadvantage as a risk for first pregnancy among adolescent females in the United States.

Authors:  Krishna K Upadhya; Jonathan M Ellen
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Abortion and mental health: findings from The National Comorbidity Survey-Replication.

Authors:  Julia R Steinberg; Charles E McCulloch; Nancy E Adler
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Estimates of unintended pregnancy rates over the last decade in France as a function of contraceptive behaviors.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; Aline Bohet; James Trussell; Nathalie Bajos
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Clusters of Factors Identify A High Prevalence of Pregnancy Involvement Among US Adolescent Males.

Authors:  May Lau; Hua Lin; Glenn Flores
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-08

Review 8.  The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-10-29

9.  Live birth, miscarriage, and abortion among U.S. women with and without disabilities.

Authors:  Willi Horner-Johnson; Sheetal Kulkarni-Rajasekhara; Blair G Darney; Mekhala Dissanayake; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.554

10.  Clandestine induced abortion: prevalence, incidence and risk factors among women in a Latin American country.

Authors:  Antonio Bernabé-Ortiz; Peter J White; Cesar P Carcamo; James P Hughes; Marco A Gonzales; Patricia J Garcia; Geoff P Garnett; King K Holmes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.