Literature DB >> 18846407

Looking beyond age and co-morbidities as predictors of outcomes in paraesophageal hernia repair.

Anirban Gupta1, David Chang, Kimberley E Steele, Michael A Schweitzer, Jerome Lyn-Sue, Anne O Lidor.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair is a technically challenging operation. These patients are typically older and have more co-morbidities than patients undergoing anti-reflux operations for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and these factors are usually cited as the reason for worse outcomes for PEH patients. Clinically, it would be useful to identify potentially modifiable variables leading to improved outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a representative sample from 37 states, using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database over a 5-year period (2001-2005). Patients undergoing any anti-reflux operation with or without hiatal hernia repair were included, and comparison was made based on primary diagnoses of PEH or GERD. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis codes not associated with reflux disease or diaphragmatic hernia, emergency admissions, and age <18. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Two sets of multivariate analyses were performed; one set adjusting for pre-treatment variables (age, gender, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index, hospital teaching status, hospital volume of anti-reflux surgery, calendar year) and a second set adjusting further for post-operative complications (splenectomy, esophageal laceration, pneumothorax, hemorrhage, cardiac, pulmonary, and thromboembolic events, (VTE)).
RESULTS: Of the 23,458 patients, 6,706 patients had PEH. PEH patients are older (60.4 vs. 49.1, p < 0.001) and have significantly more co-morbidities than GERD patients. On multivariate analysis, adjusting for pre-treatment variables, PEH patients are more likely to die and have significantly worse outcomes than GERD patients. However, further adjustment for pulmonary complications, VTE, and hemorrhage eliminates the mortality difference between PEH and GERD patients, while adjustment for cardiac complications or pneumothorax did not eliminate the difference.
CONCLUSIONS: While PEH patients have worse post-operative outcomes than GERD patients, we note that differences in mortality are explained by pulmonary complications, VTE, and hemorrhage. The impact of hemorrhagic complications on this group underscores the importance of careful dissection. Additionally, age and co-morbidities alone should not preclude a patient from PEH repair; rather, attention should be focused on peri-operative optimization of pulmonary status and prophylaxis of thromboembolic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18846407     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0685-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  22 in total

1.  The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases.

Authors:  P Schauer; S Ikramuddin; G Hamad; W Gourash
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The nationwide frequency of major adverse outcomes in antireflux surgery and the role of surgeon experience, 1992-1997.

Authors:  David R Flum; Thomas Koepsell; Patrick Heagerty; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  Dave R Lal; Carlos A Pellegrini; Brant K Oelschlager
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly and high-risk patients.

Authors:  Noopur Gangopadhyay; Juan M Perrone; Nathaniel J Soper; Brent D Matthews; J Christopher Eagon; Mary E Klingensmith; Margaret M Frisella; L Michael Brunt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Early experience and learning curve associated with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  C Deschamps; M S Allen; V F Trastek; J O Johnson; P C Pairolero
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Factors contributing to laparoscopic failure during the learning curve for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in a community hospital.

Authors:  A Voitk; J Joffe; C Alvarez; G Rosenthal
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 8.  Durability of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  M B Edye; J Canin-Endres; F Gattorno; B A Salky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation.

Authors:  J J Andujar; P K Papasavas; T Birdas; J Robke; Y Raftopoulos; D J Gagné; P F Caushaj; R J Landreneau; R J Keenan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Pulmonary embolism following laparoscopic antireflux surgery: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; J D Luketich; D M Friedman; S Ikramuddin; P R Schauer
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  6 in total

1.  Morbidity and mortality associated with antireflux surgery with or without paraesophogeal hernia: a large ACS NSQIP analysis.

Authors:  Anne O Lidor; David C Chang; Richard L Feinberg; Kimberley E Steele; Michael A Schweitzer; Marianne M Franco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Raymond Richard Price; Steven R DeMeester; Jörg Zehetner; Oliver J Muensterer; Ziad Awad; Sumeet K Mittal; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Contemporary management of paraesophaegeal hernias: establishing a European expert consensus.

Authors:  E M Bonrath; T P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Non-Elective Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Portends Worse Outcomes in Comparable Patients: a Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.

Authors:  Vernissia Tam; James D Luketich; Daniel G Winger; Inderpal S Sarkaria; Ryan M Levy; Neil A Christie; Omar Awais; Manisha R Shende; Katie S Nason
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective paraesophageal hernia repair using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Hassanain Jassim; Johnathan T Seligman; Matthew Frelich; Matthew Goldblatt; Andrew Kastenmeier; James Wallace; Heather S Zhao; Aniko Szabo; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A clinical prediction rule for perioperative mortality and major morbidity after laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  Nikiforos Ballian; James D Luketich; Ryan M Levy; Omar Awais; Dan Winger; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Katie S Nason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 5.209

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.