Literature DB >> 14752653

Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation.

J J Andujar1, P K Papasavas, T Birdas, J Robke, Y Raftopoulos, D J Gagné, P F Caushaj, R J Landreneau, R J Keenan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia (LRPEH) is a feasible and effective technique. There have been some recent concerns regarding possible high recurrence rates following laparoscopic repair.
METHODS: We reviewed our experience with LRPEH from 5/1996 to 8/2002. Large paraesophageal hernia (PEH) was defined by the presence of more than one-third of the stomach in the thoracic cavity. Principles of repair included reduction of the hernia, excision of the sac, approximation of the crura, and fundoplication. Pre- and postoperative symptoms were evaluated utilizing visual analogue scores (VAS) on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were followed with VAS and barium esophagram studies. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student's t-test.
RESULTS: A total of 166 patients with a mean age of 68 years underwent LRPEH. PEH were type II ( n = 43), type III ( n = 104), and type IV ( n = 19). Mean operative time was 160 min. Fundoplications were Nissen (127), Toupet (23), Dor (1), and Nissen-Collis (1). Fourteen patients underwent a gastropexy. One patient required early reoperation to repair an esophageal leak. Mean hospital stay was 3.9 days. At 24 months postoperatively there was statistically significant improvement in the mean symptom scores: heartburn from 6.8 to 0.5, regurgitation from 5.9 to 0.3, dysphagia from 4.0 to 0.5, chest pain from 3.7 to 0.3. Radiographic surveillance was obtained in 120 patients (72%) at a mean of 15 months postoperatively. Six patients (5%) had radiographic evidence of a recurrent paraesophageal hernia (two required surgery), 24 patients (20%) had a sliding hernia (two required surgery), and four patients (3.3%) had wrap failure (all four required surgery). Reoperation was required in 10 patients (6%); two for symptomatic recurrent PEH (1.2%), four for recurrent reflux symptoms (2.4%), and four for dysphagia (2.4%). Patients with abnormal postoperative barium esophagram studies who did not require reoperation have remained asymptomatic at a mean follow up of 14 months.
CONCLUSION: LPEHR is a safe and effective treatment for PEH. Postoperative radiographic abnormalities, such as a small sliding hernia, are often seen. The clinical importance of these findings is questionable, since only a small percentage of patients require reoperation. True PEH recurrences are uncommon and frequently asymptomatic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14752653     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8823-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  An unusual case of gastric volvulus after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  K Sato; C J Filipi; Y Shiino; S K Mittal; K Zacher; G C Gardner; Z T Awad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Clinical and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  J S Wu; D L Dunnegan; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Minimally invasive management of paraesophageal herniation in the high-risk surgical patient.

Authors:  K W Kercher; B D Matthews; J L Ponsky; S L Goldstein; R T Yavorski; R F Sing; B T Heniford
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Laparoscopic management of giant paraesophageal herniation.

Authors:  R J Wiechmann; M K Ferguson; K S Naunheim; P McKesey; S J Hazelrigg; T S Santucci; R S Macherey; R J Landreneau
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate.

Authors:  M Hashemi; J H Peters; T R DeMeester; J E Huprich; M Quek; J A Hagen; P F Crookes; J Theisen; S R DeMeester; L F Sillin; C G Bremner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  P O Buenaventura; P R Schauer; R J Keenan; J D Luketich
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-07

7.  Clinical spectrum of paraesophageal herniation.

Authors:  R J Landreneau; J A Johnson; J B Marshall; S R Hazelrigg; T M Boley; J J Curtis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Management of giant paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  T R Martin; M K Ferguson; K S Naunheim
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 9.  Durability of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  M B Edye; J Canin-Endres; F Gattorno; B A Salky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Complications of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  T L Trus; T Bax; W S Richardson; G D Branum; S J Mauren; L L Swanstrom; J G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  63 in total

1.  Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia: impact on dyspnoea.

Authors:  Jacqui C Zhu; Guillermo Becerril; Katy Marasovic; Alvin J Ing; Gregory L Falk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Combining laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair with sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Ankit D Patel; Edward Lin; Nathaniel W Lytle; Juan P Toro; Jahnavi Srinivasan; Arvinpal Singh; John F Sweeney; S Scott Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair: a review of literature.

Authors:  W A Draaisma; H G Gooszen; E Tournoij; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia.

Authors:  M A Carlson; C T Frantzides
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Raymond Richard Price; Steven R DeMeester; Jörg Zehetner; Oliver J Muensterer; Ziad Awad; Sumeet K Mittal; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Outcomes for trainees vs experienced surgeons undertaking laparoscopic antireflux surgery - is equipoise achieved?

Authors:  Claire N Brown; Lorelle T Smith; David I Watson; Peter G Devitt; Sarah K Thompson; Glyn G Jamieson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Outcomes after repair of the intrathoracic stomach: objective follow-up of up to 5 years.

Authors:  S K Mittal; J Bikhchandani; O Gurney; F Yano; T Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Katie S Nason; Neil A Christie; Arjun Pennathur; Blair A Jobe; Rodney J Landreneau; Matthew J Schuchert
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Early reoperation after laparoscopic fundoplication: the importance of routine postoperative contrast studies.

Authors:  Shigeru Tsunoda; Glyn G Jamieson; Peter G Devitt; David I Watson; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Prevalence and resolution of anemia with paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  Chady Haurani; Arthur M Carlin; Zane T Hammoud; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.