Literature DB >> 18843493

CT, MR, US,18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Dae Young Yoon1, Hee Sung Hwang, Suk Ki Chang, Young-Soo Rho, Hwoe Young Ahn, Jin Hwan Kim, In Jae Lee.   

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of four different imaging methods-computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, ultrasonography (US), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT-and their combined use for preoperative detection of cervical nodal metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Sixty-seven patients (58 men and 9 women; mean age, 60.1 years) with head and neck SCCs underwent CT, MR, US, and PET/CT before surgery. First, each study was reviewed separately for the presence of nodal metastases. Then, the value of combined images was assessed based on a confidence rating score for each modality assigned by observers. These results were verified, on a level-by-level basis, with histopathologic findings. Histopathologic examination revealed nodal metastases in 74 of 402 nodal levels. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 77.0%, 99.4%, and 95.3% for CT and MR; 78.4%, 98.5%, and 94.8% for US; and 81.1%, 98.2%, and 95.0% for PET/CT, respectively. The comparison of these modalities showed no statistically significant difference among them (p > 0.05). The combination of CT, MR, US, and PET/CT improved sensitivity (86.5%), without loss of specificity (99.4%) and accuracy (97.0%), although the difference failed to reach statistical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18843493     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1192-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  35 in total

1.  Detection of lymph node metastases in the neck: radiologic criteria.

Authors:  J A Castelijns; M W van den Brekel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Use of integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT to improve the accuracy of initial cervical nodal evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Han-Sin Jeong; Chung-Hwan Baek; Young-Ik Son; Man Ki Chung; Dong Kyung Lee; Joon Young Choi; Byung-Tae Kim; Hyung-Jin Kim
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 3.  Management of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  G B Snow; P Patel; C R Leemans; R Tiwari
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.

Authors:  Shu-Hang Ng; Tzu-Chen Yen; Chun-Ta Liao; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Sheng-Chieh Chan; Sheung-Fat Ko; Hung-Ming Wang; Ho-Fai Wong
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI.

Authors:  T Stuckensen; A F Kovács; S Adams; R P Baum
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Evaluation of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography with histopathologic correlation in the initial staging of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Anthony Hannah; Andrew M Scott; Henri Tochon-Danguy; J Gordon Chan; Tim Akhurst; Salvatore Berlangieri; David Price; Gerard J Smith; Tony Schelleman; W J McKay; Andrew Sizeland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high-resolution US.

Authors:  P Vassallo; K Wernecke; N Roos; P E Peters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Henry W D Yeung; Mithat Gonen; Dennis Kraus; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Radiologic diagnosis and staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M T Madison; K B Remley; R E Latchaw; S L Mitchell
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Evaluation of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  D M Don; Y Anzai; R B Lufkin; Y S Fu; T C Calcaterra
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  52 in total

1.  The value of PET/CT to assess clinically negative necks.

Authors:  Enver Ozer; Barış Naiboğlu; Ryan Meacham; Cherie Ryoo; Amit Agrawal; David E Schuller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Ultrasound in the diagnostic management of malignant lymphomas].

Authors:  H-P Weskott
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  [(18)F]-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of nodal metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx and larynx: comparison with CT.

Authors:  Yuko Suenaga; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Tomonori Kanda; Naoki Otsuki; Ken-Ichi Nibu; Ryohei Sasaki; Tomoo Itoh; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Combined multimodal co-registration of PET/CT and MRI images increases diagnostic accuracy in squamous cell carcinoma staging.

Authors:  Alessandro Stecco; Silvio Ciolfi; Francesco Buemi; Alessia Cassarà; Gian Mauro Sacchetti; Marco Brambilla; Alessandro Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging and ultrasound in surveillance of head and neck cancer - The 3-year experience of the ENT Department in Poznan.

Authors:  Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Mariola Popko; Karolina Piskadło; Rafał Czepczyński; Aleksandra Stankowska; Tomasz Piętka; Mirosław Dziuk; Witold Szyfter
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-09-29

7.  Initial clinical results of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  K Kubiessa; S Purz; M Gawlitza; A Kühn; J Fuchs; K G Steinhoff; A Boehm; O Sabri; R Kluge; T Kahn; P Stumpp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Potential Role of PET/MRI for Imaging Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Sungheon Gene Kim; Kent Friedman; Sohil Patel; Mari Hagiwara
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Oral Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Young-Hoon Joo; Jae-Keun Cho; Bon Seok Koo; Minsu Kwon; Seong Keun Kwon; Soon Young Kwon; Min-Su Kim; Jeong Kyu Kim; Heejin Kim; Innchul Nam; Jong-Lyel Roh; Young Min Park; Il-Seok Park; Jung Je Park; Sung-Chan Shin; Soon-Hyun Ahn; Seongjun Won; Chang Hwan Ryu; Tae Mi Yoon; Giljoon Lee; Doh Young Lee; Myung-Chul Lee; Joon Kyoo Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Jae-Yol Lim; Jae Won Chang; Jeon Yeob Jang; Man Ki Chung; Yuh-Seok Jung; Jae-Gu Cho; Yoon Seok Choi; Jeong-Seok Choi; Guk Haeng Lee; Phil-Sang Chung
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 10.  PET and MR imaging: the odd couple or a match made in heaven?

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Alexander R Guimaraes; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.