Literature DB >> 18839230

Application of acetate buffer in pH adjustment of sorghum mash and its influence on fuel ethanol fermentation.

Renyong Zhao1, Scott R Bean, Beth Ann Crozier-Dodson, Daniel Y C Fung, Donghai Wang.   

Abstract

A 2 M sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.2 was tried to simplify the step of pH adjustment in a laboratory dry-grind procedure. Ethanol yields or conversion efficiencies of 18 sorghum hybrids improved significantly with 2.0-5.9% (3.9% on average) of relative increases when the method of pH adjustment changed from traditional HCl to the acetate buffer. Ethanol yields obtained using the two methods were highly correlated (R (2) = 0.96, P < 0.0001), indicating that the acetate buffer did not influence resolution of the procedure to differentiate sorghum hybrids varying in fermentation quality. Acetate retarded the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but did not affect the overall fermentation rate. With 41-47 mM of undissociated acetic acid in mash of a sorghum hybrid at pH 4.7, rates of glucose consumption and ethanol production were inhibited during exponential phase but promoted during stationary phase. The maximum growth rate constants (mu(max)) were 0.42 and 0.32 h(-1) for cells grown in mashes with pH adjusted by HCl and the acetate buffer, respectively. Viable cell counts of yeast in mashes with pH adjusted by the acetate buffer were 36% lower than those in mashes adjusted by HCl during stationary phase. Coupled to a 5.3% relative increase in ethanol, a 43.6% relative decrease in glycerol was observed, when the acetate buffer was substituted for HCl. Acetate helped to transfer glucose to ethanol more efficiently. The strain tested did not use acetic acid as carbon source. It was suggested that decreased levels of ATP under acetate stress stimulate glycolysis to ethanol formation, increasing its yield at the expense of biomass and glycerol production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18839230     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-008-0474-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  18 in total

1.  Energetics of the effect of acetic acid on growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M E Pampulha; M C Loureiro-Dias
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Action of Acetic Acid on Food Spoilage Microörganisms.

Authors:  A S Levine; C R Fellers
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1940-05       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids.

Authors:  K C Thomas; S H Hynes; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Function of lipophilic acids as antimicrobial food additives.

Authors:  E Freese; C W Sheu; E Galliers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-02-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Regulation of intracellular pH in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  I H Madshus
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1988-02-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Characterization of very high gravity ethanol fermentation of corn mash. Effect of glucoamylase dosage, pre-saccharification and yeast strain.

Authors:  Rasmus Devantier; Sven Pedersen; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Intracellular pH distribution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell populations, analyzed by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Minoska Valli; Michael Sauer; Paola Branduardi; Nicole Borth; Danilo Porro; Diethard Mattanovich
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Buffering capacity of whole corn mash alters concentrations of organic acids required to inhibit growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and ethanol production.

Authors:  Derek A Abbott; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.461

9.  Metabolic control analysis of glycerol synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Garth R Cronwright; Johann M Rohwer; Bernard A Prior
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Measurement of yeast intracellular pH by image processing and the change it undergoes during growth phase.

Authors:  T Imai; T Ohno
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.