Literature DB >> 18836515

Level of Discrimination for Recognition Judgments Reduced following the Recognition of Semantically Related Words.

Catherine T Ngo1, Jesse Sargent, Stephen Dopkins.   

Abstract

Participants read lists of words and then made recognition judgments to pairs of words, each of which consisted of a prime word and a test word. At issue was the effect of a semantic relationship between the prime word and the test word on the recognition judgment to the test word. Under standard recognition conditions, semantic priming impeded correct recognition judgments to new test words and had no effect on recognition judgments to old test words. The overall effect was to reduce the level of discrimination for recognition judgments to the test word. Under conditions in which familiarity assessment would be expected to play a greater role in judgments to old test words, semantic priming facilitated those judgments. The results are explained in terms of a dual process account of recognition.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18836515      PMCID: PMC2131701          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  10 in total

1.  A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.

Authors:  L M Reder; A Nhouyvanisvong; C D Schunn; M S Ayers; P Angstadt; K Hiraki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new.

Authors:  S Joordens; W E Hockley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Testing global memory models using ROC curves.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; C F Sheu; S D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  Semantic and perceptual priming: how similar are the underlying mechanisms?

Authors:  M J Farah
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.

Authors:  S E Clark; S D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

7.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  A retrieval theory of priming in memory.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon; M Tindall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Does recognition of single words predict recognition of two?

Authors:  Robert L Greene; Audrey A Klein
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2004
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Superficial Priming in Episodic Recognition.

Authors:  Stephen Dopkins; Jesse Sargent; Catherine T Ngo
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Variation in the standard deviation of the lure rating distribution: Implications for estimates of recollection probability.

Authors:  Stephen Dopkins; Kaitlin Varner; Darin Hoyer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

3.  Separating the FN400 and N400 potentials across recognition memory experiments.

Authors:  Paweł Stróżak; Delora Abedzadeh; Tim Curran
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.252

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.