Literature DB >> 2522529

Semantic and perceptual priming: how similar are the underlying mechanisms?

M J Farah1.   

Abstract

Both semantic priming and perceptual priming consist of facilitation of the identification of primed stimuli and inhibition of the identification of nonprimed stimuli. The similarities between the two phenomena suggest that a common attentional mechanism underlies both, and this has been explicitly proposed by several attention theorists. In this article it is argued that the phenomena of semantic and perceptual priming are qualitatively different, perceptual priming reflecting a sensitivity change in the recognition process brought about by attention, and semantic priming reflecting a bias change in the recognition process brought about by attention. Because different mechanisms are required to produce sensitivity and bias changes, this implies that the attentional mechanisms responsible for semantic and perceptual priming are distinct. In terms of recent discussions of the modularity versus the unity of cognitive architecture, the present conclusion supports a modular architecture for attentional processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2522529     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.1.188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

Review 1.  A criterion-shift model for enhanced discriminability in perceptual identification: a note on the counter model.

Authors:  E J Wagenmakers; R Zeelenberg; L J Schooler; J G Raaijmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

2.  Perceptual and response interactions in semantic priming.

Authors:  I H Bernstein; V Bissonnette; K R Welch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-12

Review 3.  Selection from perceptual and conceptual representations.

Authors:  Irene P Kan; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Conceptual versus perceptual priming in incomplete picture identification.

Authors:  Junko Matsukawa; Joan Gay Snodgrass; Glen M Doniger
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-11

5.  Working memory and executive function: the influence of content and load on the control of attention.

Authors:  Robert Hester; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

6.  Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds.

Authors:  W A Johnston; K J Hawley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

7.  Level of Discrimination for Recognition Judgments Reduced following the Recognition of Semantically Related Words.

Authors:  Catherine T Ngo; Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  More than meets the eye: context effects in word identification.

Authors:  M E Masson; R Borowsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

9.  Left inferior prefrontal cortex activity reflects inhibitory rather than facilitatory priming.

Authors:  Eileen R Cardillo; Jennifer Aydelott; Paul M Matthews; Joseph T Devlin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.