Literature DB >> 18834620

Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

Sara A DeNardis1, Robert W Holloway, Glenn E Bigsby, Dirk P Pikaart, Sarfraz Ahmad, Neil J Finkler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical morbidity and clinical-pathologic factors for patients with endometrial cancer (EC) undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with aortic and/or pelvic lymphadenectomy (LA).
METHODS: During the first 14 months of a robotics surgical program, 56 patients with EC were scheduled to undergo RALH with LA. Cases were analyzed for operative (op) time, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion, intra- and post-op complications, surgical-pathologic data, patient demographics and length of stay (LOS). Data was compared to 106 serially treated patients with EC who underwent TAH with LA immediately prior to initiation of our robotics program.
RESULTS: Three robotic cases (5.4%) were converted to TAH secondary to intra-op factors. FIGO stages for RALH vs. TAH were: stage I (82 vs. 69%), stage II (7 vs. 7.5%) and stage III (11 vs. 21.5%). Patients' mean age was 59+/-10 vs. 63+/-11 years (p=0.05) and body mass index (BMI) was 29+/-6.5 vs. 34+/-9 kg/m(2) (p=0.0001) for the robotic and open groups, respectively. Severe medical co-morbidities affected 5.4% of robotic patients compared to 8.5% of open cases (p>0.05). Comparing RALH and TAH, mean op time was 177+/-55 vs.79+/-17 min (p=0.0001), EBL was 105+/-77 vs. 241+/-115 ml (p<0.0001), transfusion was 0 vs. 8.5% (p=0.005), and LOS was 1.0+/-0.5 vs. 3.2+/-1.0 days (p<0.0001). Robotic patients incurred a 3.6% major peri-operative complication rate while women undergoing open procedures had an incidence of 20.8% (p=0.007). Total lymph node count was 19+/-13 nodes for robotic cases vs. 18+/-10 nodes obtained from open hysterectomy patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EC who underwent RALH with LA during the first year of our robotics program were younger, thinner and had less cardio-pulmonary illness than patients previously treated with TAH and LA. LOS, EBL and peri-op complication rates were significantly lower for the robotic cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18834620     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  39 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  O E O'Sullivan; B A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Paul S Lin; Mark T Wakabayashi; Ernest S Han
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-04-08

3.  Two cases of post-coital vaginal cuff dehiscence with small bowel evisceration after robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  My-Linh T Nguyen; Monica Kapoor; Tana S Pradhan; Tarah L Pua; Sean S Tedjarati
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-04-10

4.  Surgical staging of endometrial cancer: robotic versus open technique outcomes in a contemporary single surgeon series.

Authors:  Meenu Goel; Terrell W Zollinger; David H Moore
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-14

5.  Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and staging for the treatment of endometrial cancer: a comparison with conventional laparoscopy and abdominal approaches.

Authors:  Ricardo Estape; Nicholas Lambrou; Eric Estape; Oscar Vega; Trisha Ojea
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-06-25

6.  Recent advances of robotic surgery and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Yong Wook Jung; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Robotic surgical management of endometrial cancer in octogenarians and nonagenarians: analysis of perioperative outcomes and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Patrick Lowe; Saurabh Kumar; Peter R Johnson; Scott A Kamelle; Donald H Chamberlain; Todd D Tillmanns
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-06-11

8.  Robotic-assisted gynecologic/oncologic surgery: experience of early cases in a Saudi Arabian tertiary care facility.

Authors:  Ismail A Al-Badawi; Murad Al-Aker; Jamal Al-Subhi; Ibtihal Bukhari; Osama Al-Omar; Sarfraz Ahmad
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-05-29

9.  Leukocytosis after robotic hysterectomy: commonly observed but clinically insignificant.

Authors:  Meenu Goel; Kathryn F McGonigle; Emily Vason; Howard G Muntz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-09-14

10.  Comparison of robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in obese and morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  N Nevadunsky; R Clark; S Ghosh; M Muto; R Berkowitz; A Vitonis; C Feltmate
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.