Literature DB >> 27628776

Robotic surgical management of endometrial cancer in octogenarians and nonagenarians: analysis of perioperative outcomes and review of the literature.

M Patrick Lowe1, Saurabh Kumar2, Peter R Johnson3, Scott A Kamelle3, Donald H Chamberlain4, Todd D Tillmanns2.   

Abstract

The primary aim of this article is to report the outcomes of octogenarians and nonagenarians who have undergone robotic surgery for endometrial cancer. A multi-institutional research consortium was created to evaluate the utility of robotics for gynecologic surgery (benign and malignant). IRB approval was obtained at each institution. A multi-institutional HIPPA compliant database was then created and analyzed for all patients that underwent robotic-assisted surgery with staging for endometrial cancer between the April 2003 and January 2009. In total, 395 patients were identified. A subset of patients between the ages of 80 and 95 years were then identified and analyzed for demographic data and perioperative outcomes. Twenty-seven patients in this age group were identified who underwent robotic-assisted hysterectomy and staging. The median age was 84, and median body mass index was 28. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension were identified in 22 and 74% of patients, respectively. Over one-half (56%) of the patients reported a prior abdominal surgery. Final pathological analysis demonstrated that 88% of all patients had either Stage I or II disease. The median operative time was 192 min. The median estimated blood loss was 50 cc, and the median lymph node count was 16. The median hospital stay was 1.0 day. The overall intraoperative and postoperative complication rate was 7.4 and 33%, respectively. No patient received a blood transfusion. There was one conversion to laparotomy (3.7%). A comparison of the outcomes of the elderly cohort to those of all patients in the database (control group) revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, nodal yield, or conversion rate. Intraoperative complications were statistically similar between the groups; however, postoperative complications were significantly higher in the elderly cohort. We conclude that robotic surgery is safe, feasible, and expands surgical options for octogenarians and nonagenarians diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Age should not be considered a contraindication for robotic surgical management of patients with endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Endometrial cancer; Minimally invasive surgery; Octogenarians; Robotic hysterectomy; Robotic surgery; Uterine cancer

Year:  2010        PMID: 27628776     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-010-0195-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  16 in total

1.  The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery.

Authors:  Anna V Hoekstra; Arati Jairam-Thodla; Alfred Rademaker; Diljeet K Singh; Barbara M Buttin; John R Lurain; Julian C Schink; M Patrick Lowe
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.547

2.  The effect of age on clinical/pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  J A Lachance; E N Everett; B Greer; L Mandel; E Swisher; H Tamimi; B Goff
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials.

Authors:  L F Hutchins; J M Unger; J J Crowley; C A Coltman; K S Albain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Tommaso Susini; Giambattista Massi; Gianni Amunni; Carlo Carriero; Mauro Marchionni; Gianluigi Taddei; Gianfranco Scarselli
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  M Patrick Lowe; Peter R Johnson; Scott A Kamelle; Saurabh Kumar; Donald H Chamberlain; Todd D Tillmanns
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Representation of older patients in cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  E L Trimble; C L Carter; D Cain; B Freidlin; R S Ungerleider; M A Friedman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.

Authors:  Dan S Veljovich; Pamela J Paley; Charles W Drescher; Elise N Everett; Chirag Shah; William A Peters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Leigh G Seamon; David E Cohn; Debra L Richardson; Sue Valmadre; Matthew J Carlson; Gary S Phillips; Jeffrey M Fowler
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Pathologic findings and outcomes for octogenarians presenting with uterine malignancy.

Authors:  Kathleen N Moore; Grainger S Lanneau; Chad Smith; Marion Lanneau; Joan L Walker; Michael A Gold; D Scott McMeekin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2.

Authors:  Joan L Walker; Marion R Piedmonte; Nick M Spirtos; Scott M Eisenkop; John B Schlaerth; Robert S Mannel; Gregory Spiegel; Richard Barakat; Michael L Pearl; Sudarshan K Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Elderly Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Multicentric Study.

Authors:  Giacomo Corrado; Enrico Vizza; Anna Myriam Perrone; Liliana Mereu; Vito Cela; Francesco Legge; Georgios Hilaris; Tina Pasciuto; Marco D'Indinosante; Eleonora La Fera; Camilla Certelli; Valentina Bruno; Stylianos Kogeorgos; Francesco Fanfani; Pierandrea De Iaco; Giovanni Scambia; Valerio Gallotta
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Sentinel Lymph Node in Aged Endometrial Cancer Patients "The SAGE Study": A Multicenter Experience.

Authors:  Stefano Cianci; Andrea Rosati; Virginia Vargiu; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Giulio Sozzi; Alessandro Gioè; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Alfredo Ercoli; Francesco Cosentino; Roberto Berretta; Vito Chiantera; Giovanni Scambia; Francesco Fanfani
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.