Literature DB >> 19353274

Role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer.

Paul S Lin1, Mark T Wakabayashi, Ernest S Han.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Uterine cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in women in the United States with an estimated number of 40,100 women diagnosed in 2008, the great majority of which belongs to endometrial classification. The traditional approach to treatment of endometrial cancer has been primarily surgery via an open, laparotomy incision. Minimally invasive approaches with smaller incisions, i.e., laparoscopy for the management of endometrial cancer was initially reported in 1992; however, its adoption has been slow due to the prolonged learning curve needed to become proficient in such a technique. Robotic-assisted surgery, a further advancement of traditional laparoscopy, using computer-based controls has been developed enabling the performance of complex procedures that otherwise had been too difficult to accomplish in a minimally invasive fashion. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is one such example that has gained rapid acceptance in recent years. Although the use of robotic-assisted laparoscopy for endometrial cancer is still in its early phase, this approach is anticipated to become similarly, a common approach to the management of endometrial cancer in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19353274     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-009-0086-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of the results of surgical treatment using laparoscopy and laparotomy in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  P Sobiczewski; M Bidzinski; P Derlatka; A Dańska-Bidzińska; J Gmyrek; G Panek
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Twelve-year experience in the management of endometrial cancer: a change in surgical and postoperative radiation approaches.

Authors:  Richard R Barakat; Gali Lev; Amanda J Hummer; Yukio Sonoda; Dennis S Chi; Kaled M Alektiar; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Antonio Gil-Moreno; Berta Díaz-Feijoo; Sergio Morchón; Jordi Xercavins
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in patients with stage I and II endometrial cancer.

Authors:  D-Y Kim; M-K Kim; J-H Kim; D-S Suh; Y-M Kim; Y-T Kim; J-E Mok; J-H Nam
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Total laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage 1 endometrial cancer: the LACE randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Janda; V Gebski; P Forder; D Jackson; G Williams; A Obermair
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?

Authors:  Paola A Gehrig; Leigh A Cantrell; Aaron Shafer; Lisa N Abaid; Alberto Mendivil; John F Boggess
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mario Malzoni; Raffaele Tinelli; Francesco Cosentino; Ciro Perone; Marianna Rasile; Domenico Iuzzolino; Carmine Malzoni; Harry Reich
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging.

Authors:  Andrea Mariani; Sean C Dowdy; William A Cliby; Bobbie S Gostout; Monica B Jones; Timothy O Wilson; Karl C Podratz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrence and survival.

Authors:  Andreas Obermair; Tom P Manolitsas; Yee Leung; Ian G Hammond; Anthony J McCartney
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: cohort review of patients with uterine neoplasia.

Authors:  Katherine A O'Hanlan; Gloria Shining Huang; Anne-Caroline Garnier; Suzanne L Dibble; Mirjam L Reuland; Lisbeth Lopez; Rebecca L Pinto
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  7 in total

1.  The technique of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology, its introduction into the clinical routine of a gynaecological department and the analysis of the perioperative courses - a German experience.

Authors:  A Kubilay Ertan; Michael Ulbricht; Kirsten Huebner; Alexander Di Liberto
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-06-01

2.  Controversies in surgical staging of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  R Seracchioli; S Solfrini; M Mabrouk; C Facchini; N Di Donato; L Manuzzi; L Savelli; S Venturoli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-23

3.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 4.  Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weimin Xie; Dongyan Cao; Jiaxin Yang; Keng Shen; Lin Zhao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ga Won Yim; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Hee Jung Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Ga Won Yim; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Cheng Luo; Mei Liu; Xiuli Li
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.809

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.