Literature DB >> 18832560

Age-related declines in general cognitive abilities of Balb/C mice are associated with disparities in working memory, body weight, and general activity.

Louis D Matzel1, Henya Grossman, Kenneth Light, David Townsend, Stefan Kolata.   

Abstract

A defining characteristic of age-related cognitive decline is a deficit in general cognitive performance. Here we use a testing and analysis regimen that allows us to characterize the general learning abilities of young (3-5 mo old) and aged (19-21 mo old) male and female Balb/C mice. Animals' performance was assessed on a battery of seven diverse learning tasks. Aged animals exhibited deficits in five of the seven tasks and ranked significantly lower than their young counterparts in general learning abilities (aggregate performance across the battery of tasks). Aging added variability to common core performance (i.e., general learning ability), which translated into increased variability on the individual cognitive tasks. Relatedly, general learning abilities did not differ between the two ages among the best quartile of learners (i.e., cognitive abilities were spared in a subsample of the aged animals). Additionally, working memory capacity (resistance to interference) and duration (resistance to decay) accounted for significantly more of the variability in general learning abilities in aged relative to young animals. Tests of 15 noncognitive performance variables indicated that an increase in body weight (and an associated decrease in general activity) was characteristic of those aged animals which exhibited deficient general learning abilities. These results suggest the possibility that general cognitive deficits in aged animals reflect a failure of specific components of the working memory system, and may be related to variations in body weight and an associated decrease in activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18832560      PMCID: PMC2632791          DOI: 10.1101/lm.954808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  35 in total

1.  Genetics and general cognitive ability.

Authors:  R Plomin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Behavioral biomarkers of aging: illustration of a multivariate approach for detecting age-related behavioral changes.

Authors:  A L Markowska; S J Breckler
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse; Thomas M Atkinson; Diane E Berish
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-12

4.  Individual differences in the expression of a "general" learning ability in mice.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Yu Ray Han; Henya Grossman; Meghana S Karnik; Dave Patel; Nicholas Scott; Steven M Specht; Chetan C Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Age and time-of-day effects on learning and memory in a non-matching-to-sample test.

Authors:  Gordon Winocur; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  An age comparison of the rates of acquisition and forgetting of spatial information in relation to long-term enhancement of hippocampal synapses.

Authors:  C A Barnes; B L McNaughton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  The interactive effects of nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptor inhibition on fear conditioning in young and aged C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Olivia Feiro; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 8.  Human abilities.

Authors:  R J Sternberg; J C Kaufman
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  The implications of body fat mass and fat distribution for cognitive function in elderly women.

Authors:  Yu Z Bagger; László B Tankó; Peter Alexandersen; Gerong Qin; Claus Christiansen
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2004-09

10.  Human nerve growth factor improves spatial memory in aged but not in young rats.

Authors:  A L Markowska; V E Koliatsos; S J Breckler; D L Price; D S Olton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  20 in total

1.  S 18986 reverses spatial working memory impairments in aged mice: comparison with memantine.

Authors:  Matthias Vandesquille; Ali Krazem; Caroline Louis; Pierre Lestage; Daniel Béracochéa
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Dissecting the age-related decline on spatial learning and memory tasks in rodent models: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in senescent synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Thomas C Foster
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Age-related impairments of new memories reflect failures of learning, not retention.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Christopher Wass; Stefan Kolata; Kenneth Light; Danielle C Colas
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Are there geniuses among the apes?

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Josep Call
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Exploratory, anxiety and spatial memory impairments are dissociated in mice lacking the LPA1 receptor.

Authors:  Estela Castilla-Ortega; Jorge Sánchez-López; Carolina Hoyo-Becerra; Elisa Matas-Rico; Emma Zambrana-Infantes; Jerold Chun; Fernando Rodríguez De Fonseca; Carmen Pedraza; Guillermo Estivill-Torrús; Luis J Santin
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Accelerated decline in cognition in a mouse model of increased oxidative stress.

Authors:  Sreemathi Logan; Gordon H Royce; Daniel Owen; Julie Farley; Michelle Ranjo-Bishop; William E Sonntag; Sathyaseelan S Deepa
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 7.713

7.  The external-internal loop of interference: two types of attention and their influence on the learning abilities of mice.

Authors:  Bruno Sauce; Christopher Wass; Andrew Smith; Stephanie Kwan; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 8.  Training your brain: Do mental and physical (MAP) training enhance cognition through the process of neurogenesis in the hippocampus?

Authors:  D M Curlik; T J Shors
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 9.  Selective attention, working memory, and animal intelligence.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Stefan Kolata
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Learning impairments identified early in life are predictive of future impairments associated with aging.

Authors:  Rikki Hullinger; Corinna Burger
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.