Literature DB >> 18832184

Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing.

Andreas Natsch1, Roger Emter, Graham Ellis.   

Abstract

Tests for skin sensitization are required prior to the market launch of new cosmetic ingredients. Significant efforts are made to replace the current animal tests. It is widely recognized that this cannot be accomplished with a single in vitro test, but that rather the integration of results from different in vitro and in silico assays will be needed for the prediction of the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. This has been proposed as a theoretical scheme so far, but no attempts have been made to use experimental data to prove the validity of this concept. Here we thus try for the first time to fill this widely cited concept with data. To this aim, we integrate and report both novel and literature data on 116 chemicals of known skin sensitization potential on the following parameters: (1) peptide reactivity as a surrogate for protein binding, (2) induction of antioxidant/electrophile responsive element dependent luciferase activity as a cell-based assay; (3) Tissue Metabolism Simulator skin sensitization model in silico prediction; and (4) calculated octanol-water partition coefficient. The results of the in vitro assays were scaled into five classes from 0 to 4 to give an in vitro score and compared to the local lymph node assay (LLNA) data, which were also scaled from 0 to 4 (nonsensitizer/weak/moderate/strong/extreme). Different ways of evaluating these data have been assessed to rate the hazard of chemicals (Cooper statistics) and to also scale their potency. With the optimized model an overall accuracy for predicting sensitizers of 87.9% was obtained. There is a linear correlation between the LLNA score and the in vitro score. However, the correlation needs further improvement as there is still a relatively high variation in the in vitro score between chemicals belonging to the same sensitization potency class.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18832184     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  13 in total

1.  Probabilistic hazard assessment for skin sensitization potency by dose-response modeling using feature elimination instead of quantitative structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; James M McKim; Thomas Hartung; Andre Kleensang; Vanessa Sá-Rocha
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.446

2.  Fragment-based prediction of skin sensitization using recursive partitioning.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Mingyue Zheng; Yong Wang; Qiancheng Shen; Xiaomin Luo; Hualiang Jiang; Kaixian Chen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Mechanistic understanding of molecular initiating events (MIEs) using NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Paul N Sanderson; Wendy Simpson; Richard Cubberley; Maja Aleksic; Stephen Gutsell; Paul J Russell
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Qingda Zang; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Shannon Bell; Nicole Kleinstreuer; David Allen; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Warren Casey; Judy Strickland
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.446

5.  Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Qingda Zang; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Neepa Choksi; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Anna Lowit; David Allen; Warren Casey
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.446

6.  Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nripen S Sharma; Rohit Jindal; Bhaskar Mitra; Serom Lee; Lulu Li; Tim J Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.321

7.  Machine learning of chemical reactivity from databases of organic reactions.

Authors:  Gonçalo V S M Carrera; Sunil Gupta; João Aires-de-Sousa
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Qingda Zang; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; David Allen; Neepa Choksi; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Warren Casey; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 9.  In vitro methods for hazard assessment of industrial chemicals - opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Chin Lin Wong; Sussan Ghassabian; Maree T Smith; Ai-Leen Lam
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Integrated Computational Solution for Predicting Skin Sensitization Potential of Molecules.

Authors:  Konda Leela Sarath Kumar; Sujit R Tangadpalliwar; Aarti Desai; Vivek K Singh; Abhay Jere
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.