Literature DB >> 18829097

Approach for valuating the influence of laboratory simulation.

Martin Rosentritt1, Michael Behr, Jef M van der Zel, Albert J Feilzer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to determine the fracture resistance of zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after laboratory simulation. Failure type and failure rates during simulation were compared to available clinical data for estimating the relevance of the simulation.
METHODS: 32 FPDs were fabricated of a zirconia ceramic and a corresponding ceramic veneer. The FPDs were adhesively bonded on human molars and artificial aging was performed for investigating the survival rate during thermal cycling and mechanical loading (TCML1; 3.6Mio x 50N ML). Survival rates were compared to available clinical data and the TCML parameter "mastication force" was adapted accordingly for a second TCML run (TCML2; 3.6Mio x 100N ML). The fracture resistance of the FPDs which survived TCML was determined. FPDs were examined without TCML (control) or after TCML according to literature (1.2Mio x 50N ML). Data were statistically analyzed (Mann-Whitney U-test) and curve fitting/regression analysis of the survival rates was performed.
RESULTS: TCML reduced survival rates down to 63%. Failures during TCML were chipping off of the veneering ceramic, no zirconia framework was damaged. Under clinical conditions comparable failures (chipping) are reported. The clinical survival rate (approximately 10%) is lower compared to TCML data because of the short period of observation. The fracture resistance after TCML was significantly reduced from 1058N (control) to values between 320 and 533N.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that TCML with 1.2Mio x 50N provides a sufficient explanatory power. TCML with prolonged simulation time may allow the definition of a mathematical model for estimating future survival rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18829097     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  20 in total

1.  Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens.

Authors:  Bogna Stawarczyk; Andreas Ender; Albert Trottmann; Mutlu Özcan; Jens Fischer; Christoph H F Hämmerle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Influence of cusp inclination and curvature on the in vitro failure and fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.

Authors:  Verena Preis; Thomas Dowerk; Michael Behr; Carola Kolbeck; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Two-body wear of dental porcelain and substructure oxide ceramics.

Authors:  Martin Rosentritt; Verena Preis; Michael Behr; Sebastian Hahnel; Gerhard Handel; Carola Kolbeck
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Performance of dental ceramics: challenges for improvements.

Authors:  E D Rekow; N R F A Silva; P G Coelho; Y Zhang; P Guess; V P Thompson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Load-bearing capacity of artificially aged zirconia fixed dental prostheses with heterogeneous abutment supports.

Authors:  Katia Sarafidou; Meike Stiesch; Marc Philipp Dittmer; Daniela Jörn; Lothar Borchers; Philipp Kohorst
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Are implants more reliable than severely compromised endodontically treated teeth as abutments for zirconia-based FPDs? : In vitro results of long-term preclinical load simulation.

Authors:  M Naumann; C Hohmann; A Happe; F Beuer; R Frankenberger; R Seemann; M Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Impact of simulated reduced alveolar bone support, increased tooth mobility, and distal post-supported, root-treated abutment tooth on load capability of all-ceramic zirconia-supported cantilever FDP.

Authors:  M Naumann; M von Stein-Lausnitz; M Rosentritt; C Walter; H Meyer-Lückel; G Sterzenbach
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  In vitro comparison of implant- versus gingiva-supported removable dentures in anterior and posterior applications.

Authors:  Martin Rosentritt; Felix Heidtkamp; Helmut Hösl; Sebastian Hahnel; Verena Preis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Influence of artificial ageing on surface properties and Streptococcus mutans adhesion to dental composite materials.

Authors:  Sebastian Hahnel; Anne Henrich; Martin Rosentritt; Gerhard Handel; Ralf Bürgers
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  In vitro performance and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant supported molar crowns.

Authors:  Martin Rosentritt; Sebastian Hahnel; Frank Engelhardt; Michael Behr; Verena Preis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.