Literature DB >> 18827136

Mode of delivery: toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences.

Margaret Olivia Little1, Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Lisa M Mitchell, Elizabeth M Armstrong, Lisa H Harris, Rebecca Kukla, Miriam Kuppermann.   

Abstract

Deciding when and how to incorporate patient preferences regarding mode of delivery is challenging for both obstetric providers and policymakers. An analysis of current guidelines in four clinical scenarios (prior cesarean, twin delivery, breech presentation, and maternal request for cesarean) indicates that some guidelines are highly prescriptive whereas others are more flexible, based on physicians' discretion or (less frequently) patient preferences, without consistency or explicit rationale for when such flexibility is permissible, advisable, or obligatory. Although patient-choice advocates have called for more patient-responsive guidelines, concerns also have been raised, especially in the context of discussions of cesarean delivery on maternal request, about the dangers of unfettered patient-preference-driven clinical decisions. In this article, we outline a framework for the responsible inclusion of patient preferences into decision making regarding approach to delivery. We conclude, using this framework, that more explicit incorporation of patient preferences is called for in the first three scenarios and indicate why expanding access to cesarean delivery on maternal request is more complicated and would require more data and further consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18827136      PMCID: PMC2643019          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181888fd8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  19 in total

1.  Elective primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Howard Minkoff; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  ACOG Practice Bulletin #54: vaginal birth after previous cesarean.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin #56: Multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Changing policies on vaginal birth after cesarean: impact on access.

Authors:  Richard G Roberts; Mark Deutchman; Valerie J King; George E Fryer; Thomas J Miyoshi
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  ACOG committee opinion: number 265, December 2001. Mode of term single breech delivery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.

Authors:  M E Hannah; W J Hannah; S A Hewson; E D Hodnett; S Saigal; A R Willan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods.

Authors:  Dominique P Béhague; Cesar G Victora; Fernando C Barros
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-20

Review 8.  Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen L Hogle; Eileen K Hutton; Kerry A McBrien; Jon F r Barrett; Mary E Hannah
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section: trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysis.

Authors:  David D Mankuta; Moshe M Leshno; Moshe M Menasche; Mayer M Brezis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394, December 2007. Cesarean delivery on maternal request.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  18 in total

1.  Moral implications of obstetric technologies for pregnancy and motherhood.

Authors:  Susanne Brauer
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-03

2.  Women's Preferences Regarding the Processes and Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Anjali J Kaimal; William A Grobman; Allison S Bryant; Laura Norrell; Yamilee Bermingham; Anna Altshuler; Mari-Paule Thiet; Juan Gonzalez; Peter Bacchetti; Michelle Moghadassi; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Relationship between mode of delivery and development of urinary incontinence: A possible link is demonstrated.

Authors:  Zaheera Saadia
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2015-10

4.  Toward an ethically responsible approach to vaginal birth after cesarean.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Margaret Olivia Little
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn A Houston; Erica Wu; Mari-Paule Thiet; Sanae Nakagawa; Aaron B Caughey; Atoosa Firouzian; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The perils of protection: vulnerability and women in clinical research.

Authors:  Toby Schonfeld
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-06

7.  Effect of a Patient-Centered Decision Support Tool on Rates of Trial of Labor After Previous Cesarean Delivery: The PROCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Miriam Kuppermann; Anjali J Kaimal; Cinthia Blat; Juan Gonzalez; Mari-Paule Thiet; Yamilee Bermingham; Anna L Altshuler; Allison S Bryant; Peter Bacchetti; William A Grobman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Erica Wu; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn Houston; Lynn M Yee; Sanae Nakagawa; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Acceptance of trial of labor after cesarean (Tolac) among obstetricians in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Khulood Hussein; Abdulrahim Gari; Ruqayyah Kamal; Hussam Alzharani; Nasir Alsubai; Tayy Aljuhani; Husam Katib
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Cultural perceptions and preferences of Iranian women regarding cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Robab Latifnejad-Roudsari; Maryam Zakerihamidi; Effat Merghati-Khoei; Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.