Literature DB >> 26715925

Relationship between mode of delivery and development of urinary incontinence: A possible link is demonstrated.

Zaheera Saadia1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is a major problem faced by many mothers and has been traditionally linked to diverse ways of delivery. However, there is still a lack of clinical data, which can corroborate this notion. Thus, the present study was conducted to evaluate the correlation of urinary incontinence developed in women under different modes of delivery that have been used during childbirth. The study was conducted by considering three ways of delivery such as vaginal, cesarean section and the use of instruments during childbirth. The results were compared in each group in terms of number of women that developed or experienced urinary incontinence with those who have no problem at all or have minor problems.
METHODS: The study was conducted at Qassim University Clinic, and Maternity and Child Hospital Buraidah from Jan-May 2015 as a descriptive cross sectional study. The objective was to determine the core reasons as to why women tend to develop some urinary incontinence after delivery. First 111 women without urinary incontinence and 100 women with urinary incontinence were asked retrospectively about the number of vaginal deliveries they had underwent. Then another group (111 without urinary incontinence and 100 with urinary continence were asked about the number of instrumental deliveries they had undegone. The same was repeated (111 women without urinary incontinence and 100 with urinary incontinence) for women with cesarean section.
RESULTS: Having five or more vaginal births had a significantly (p<0.001) high risk for development of urinary incontinence (n=74, 66.67%) as compared to no urinary incontinence (n=8, 8.0%). In the group who had no cesarean section, there was a significantly (p <0 .001) larger proportion of participants with urinary problems (n = 100, 90.09%) than those without urinary problems (n = 61, 61.0%). For participants who have had an instrumental delivery, there was a significantly (p =0 .014) larger proportion of participants with urinary problems (n = 22, 19.82%) than those without urinary problems (n = 8, 8.0%). However, for participants that have not had an instrumental delivery, there was a significantly larger amount of participants without urinary problems than those with urinary problems (p <0 .001).
CONCLUSION: Women with 5 or more vaginal deliveries as well as instrumental deliveries were more liable to develop urinary incontinence in this study. This may be because vaginal deliveries and instrumental deliveries lead to perineal damage. This is further supported by the results of this study showing that women who never had cesarean section were more likely to report urinary incontinence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Saudi Arabia; Urinary incontinence; instrumental delivery

Year:  2015        PMID: 26715925      PMCID: PMC4682600     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)        ISSN: 1658-3639


  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Urinary stress incontinence in women.

Authors:  Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  [Mode of delivery on urinary incontinence].

Authors:  Xin Yang; Hong Zheng; Qin-ping Liao; Rui-xue Tao; Chun Fu; Xiang-li Peng; Dan Wang; Yan-qiu Luan
Journal:  Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2004-10

3.  The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery.

Authors:  A H MacLennan; A W Taylor; D H Wilson; D Wilson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Risk factors for urinary incontinence among middle-aged women.

Authors:  Kim N Danforth; Mary K Townsend; Karen Lifford; Gary C Curhan; Neil M Resnick; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Pelvic floor disorders 5-10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth.

Authors:  Victoria L Handa; Joan L Blomquist; Leise R Knoepp; Kay A Hoskey; Kelly C McDermott; Alvaro Muñoz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Mode of delivery: toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences.

Authors:  Margaret Olivia Little; Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Lisa M Mitchell; Elizabeth M Armstrong; Lisa H Harris; Rebecca Kukla; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  The association between urinary and fecal incontinence and social isolation in older women.

Authors:  Sallis O Yip; Madeline A Dick; Alexandra M McPencow; Deanna K Martin; Maria M Ciarleglio; Elisabeth A Erekson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Urinary incontinence and depression in middle-aged United States women.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Carolyn Turvey; Trudy L Burns; Elizabeth Crischilles; Robert Wallace
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Vaginal childbirth and pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Hafsa U Memon; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2013-05

10.  A comparison of the long-term consequences of vaginal delivery versus caesarean section on the prevalence, severity and bothersomeness of urinary incontinence subtypes: a national cohort study in primiparous women.

Authors:  M Gyhagen; M Bullarbo; T F Nielsen; I Milsom
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.