Literature DB >> 26884130

When audiovisual correspondence disturbs visual processing.

Sang Wook Hong1,2, Won Mok Shim3,4,5.   

Abstract

Multisensory integration is known to create a more robust and reliable perceptual representation of one's environment. Specifically, a congruent auditory input can make a visual stimulus more salient, consequently enhancing the visibility and detection of the visual target. However, it remains largely unknown whether a congruent auditory input can also impair visual processing. In the current study, we demonstrate that temporally congruent auditory input disrupts visual processing, consequently slowing down visual target detection. More importantly, this cross-modal inhibition occurs only when the contrast of visual targets is high. When the contrast of visual targets is low, enhancement of visual target detection is observed, consistent with the prediction based on the principle of inverse effectiveness (PIE) in cross-modal integration. The switch of the behavioral effect of audiovisual interaction from benefit to cost further extends the PIE to encompass the suppressive cross-modal interaction.

Keywords:  Audiovisual correspondence; Contrast; Cross-modal inhibition; Multisensory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26884130     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4591-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  Audiovisual interactions in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Verena Conrad; Andreas Bartels; Mario Kleiner; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages.

Authors:  Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-03       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch; Lee A Gilroy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  When sustained attention impairs perception.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-10       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Attention speeds binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; David Alais; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Interactions between apparent motion rivalry in vision and touch.

Authors:  Verena Conrad; Marco Pino Vitello; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-07-17

8.  Semantic analysis does not occur in the absence of awareness induced by interocular suppression.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Preperceptual and stimulus-selective enhancement of low-level human visual cortex excitability by sounds.

Authors:  Vincenzo Romei; Micah M Murray; Céline Cappe; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Sound-induced enhancement of low-intensity vision: multisensory influences on human sensory-specific cortices and thalamic bodies relate to perceptual enhancement of visual detection sensitivity.

Authors:  Toemme Noesselt; Sascha Tyll; Carsten Nicolas Boehler; Eike Budinger; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jon Driver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.