Literature DB >> 18809640

Patient empowerment in clinical genetics services.

Marion McAllister1, Katherine Payne, Rhona Macleod, Stuart Nicholls, Linda Davies.   

Abstract

Outcome measurement in clinical genetics is problematic because the patient benefits are difficult to measure. The aim in this qualitative grounded theory study was to develop a theoretical framework describing the patient benefits from using clinical genetics services. Seven focus groups and 19 interviews were conducted with patients, patient group representatives, and health professionals. Data analysis resulted in construction of a model of empowerment summarizing the patient benefits from using clinical genetics services. Empowerment is similar to the concept of perceived personal control (PPC), and a measure of PPC has been developed for use in evaluations of clinical genetics services. However, empowerment includes some benefits not captured by PPC related to empowerment of other at risk relatives, and future generations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18809640     DOI: 10.1177/1359105308095063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  35 in total

1.  Empowerment: qualitative underpinning of a new clinical genetics-specific patient-reported outcome.

Authors:  Marion McAllister; Graham Dunn; Chris Todd
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Communication about DTC testing: commentary on a 'family experience of personal genomics'.

Authors:  Anna Middleton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Christalla Pithara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Explaining Mendelian inheritance in genetic consultations: an IPR study of counselor and counselee experiences.

Authors:  Theodora Gale; Sara Pasalodos-Sanchez; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar; Georgina Hall; Rhona MacLeod
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Grounded theory in genetic counseling research: an interpretive perspective.

Authors:  Robin E Grubs; Maria Piantanida
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Deaf genetic testing and psychological well-being in deaf adults.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Michelle Fox; Joshua L Deignan; Yoko Kobayashi; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne Grody; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation with Preliminary Validation of GCOS-24 for Use in Spain.

Authors:  Patricia Muñoz-Cabello; Sixto García-Miñaúr; Manuel Eliecer Espinel-Vallejo; Lorenzo Fernández-Franco; Alexandra Stephens; Fernando Santos-Simarro; Pablo Lapunzina-Badía; Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Patient expectations and attitudes towards specialist genetic eye services.

Authors:  E Clarke; R Combs; G Black; G Hall
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Evaluating a unique, specialist psychiatric genetic counseling clinic: uptake and impact.

Authors:  A Inglis; D Koehn; B McGillivray; S E Stewart; J Austin
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.438

10.  Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  C Roadhouse; C Shuman; K Anstey; K Sappleton; D Chitayat; E Ignagni
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.