OBJECTIVE: To compare 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) at 3 Tesla (3T) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm occlusion after endovascular coiling. METHODS: In a prospective study, 51 consecutive patients (25 females, 26 males; median age, 51 years) with 51 saccular aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling underwent simultaneous DSA and 3T TOF-MRA at follow-up. DSA and TOF-MRA images were analyzed independently by two senior neuroradiologists. Findings were assigned to 1 of 3 categories in the Raymond classification: complete obliteration, residual neck or residual aneurysm. Agreement between observers and techniques was evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: DSA images were not interpretable for one patient. Interobserver agreement was determined as excellent for DSA (kappa=0.86) and TOF-MRA (kappa=0.80). After reaching a consensus, DSA follow-up showed 26 (51%) complete obliterations, 20 (39%) residual necks and 4 (8%) residual aneurysms. TOF-MRA showed 23 (45%) complete obliterations, 22 (43%) residual necks and 6 (12%) residual aneurysms. Comparison between TOF-MRA and DSA showed excellent agreement between the techniques (kappa=0.86). In the four cases that were misclassified, TOF-MRA findings were assigned to a higher class than for DSA. CONCLUSION: TOF-MRA at 3T is at least as efficient as DSA for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm occlusion after endovascular treatment with detachable coils. We suggest that TOF-MRA at 3T might be used as the primary method for imaging follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms.
OBJECTIVE: To compare 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) at 3 Tesla (3T) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm occlusion after endovascular coiling. METHODS: In a prospective study, 51 consecutive patients (25 females, 26 males; median age, 51 years) with 51 saccular aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling underwent simultaneous DSA and 3T TOF-MRA at follow-up. DSA and TOF-MRA images were analyzed independently by two senior neuroradiologists. Findings were assigned to 1 of 3 categories in the Raymond classification: complete obliteration, residual neck or residual aneurysm. Agreement between observers and techniques was evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: DSA images were not interpretable for one patient. Interobserver agreement was determined as excellent for DSA (kappa=0.86) and TOF-MRA (kappa=0.80). After reaching a consensus, DSA follow-up showed 26 (51%) complete obliterations, 20 (39%) residual necks and 4 (8%) residual aneurysms. TOF-MRA showed 23 (45%) complete obliterations, 22 (43%) residual necks and 6 (12%) residual aneurysms. Comparison between TOF-MRA and DSA showed excellent agreement between the techniques (kappa=0.86). In the four cases that were misclassified, TOF-MRA findings were assigned to a higher class than for DSA. CONCLUSION: TOF-MRA at 3T is at least as efficient as DSA for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm occlusion after endovascular treatment with detachable coils. We suggest that TOF-MRA at 3T might be used as the primary method for imaging follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms.
Authors: M J van Amerongen; H D Boogaarts; J de Vries; A L M Verbeek; F J A Meijer; M Prokop; R H M A Bartels Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T J Kaufmann; J Huston; H J Cloft; J Mandrekar; L Gray; M A Bernstein; J L Atkinson; D F Kallmes Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Manasi Ramachandran; Rohini Retarekar; Robert E Harbaugh; David Hasan; Bruno Policeni; Robert Rosenwasser; Christopher Ogilvy; Madhavan L Raghavan Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.495
Authors: G Spilberg; S L Carniato; R M King; I M J van der Bom; M Mehra; R P Walvick; A K Wakhloo; M J Gounis Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Min Soo Kim; Kyung Il Jo; Je Young Yeon; Jong Soo Kim; Keon Ha Kim; Pyoung Jeon; Seung Chyul Hong Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Karsten H Wrede; Toshinori Matsushige; Sophia L Goericke; Bixia Chen; Lale Umutlu; Harald H Quick; Mark E Ladd; Sören Johst; Michael Forsting; Ulrich Sure; Marc Schlamann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: P Mordasini; A K Kraehenbuehl; J V Byrne; S Vandenberghe; M Reinert; H Hoppe; J Gralla Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 3.825