Literature DB >> 24151529

Sensitivity of Quantified Intracranial Aneurysm Geometry to Imaging Modality.

Manasi Ramachandran1, Rohini Retarekar, Robert E Harbaugh, David Hasan, Bruno Policeni, Robert Rosenwasser, Christopher Ogilvy, Madhavan L Raghavan.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the sensitivity of intracranial aneurysm geometry to the modality of imaging. Four imaging modalities-3D rotational angiography (3DRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA)-were assessed using data from a flow phantom and human subjects. A silicone flow phantom of the head and neck arteries with a 10 mm ACOM aneurysm was imaged using all four modalities under steady flow conditions. Three human subjects with mid to large sized intracranial aneurysm who had a 3DRA scan and one of CTA, CE-MRA, or TOF-MRA performed within a day were also studied. The aneurysm and contiguous vasculature were segmented for all available scans and geometric measures of their size (5 indices) and shape (6 indices) were estimated and compared. Visually, the size and shape of segmented 3D models of the aneurysms were similar across scan modalities for both the human subjects and the flow phantom. Consequently, the computed indices were consistent across modalities in the key morphometric indices. In conclusion, quantified indices of 3D geometry of the mid to large sized intracranial aneurysms investigated in this small study population are not sensitive to scanning modality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D reconstruction; Aneurysm size and shape indices; Cerebral vasculature phantom; Multimodality imaging

Year:  2013        PMID: 24151529      PMCID: PMC3799891          DOI: 10.1007/s13239-013-0119-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol        ISSN: 1869-408X            Impact factor:   2.495


  18 in total

Review 1.  CTA and MRA: visualization without catheterization.

Authors:  Douglas Green; Dennis Parker
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics modeling of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a study of the sensitivity of intra-aneurysmal flow patterns to flow conditions in the carotid arteries.

Authors:  M A Castro; C M Putman; J R Cebral
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  An objective approach to digital removal of saccular aneurysms: technique and applications.

Authors:  M D Ford; Y Hoi; M Piccinelli; L Antiga; D A Steinman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils.

Authors:  Charles B L M Majoie; Marieke E Sprengers; Willem Jan J van Rooij; Cristina Lavini; Menno Sluzewski; Jeroen C van Rijn; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk.

Authors:  Madhavan L Raghavan; Baoshun Ma; Robert E Harbaugh
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Suzie Bash; J Pablo Villablanca; Reza Jahan; Gary Duckwiler; Monica Tillis; Chelsea Kidwell; Jeffrey Saver; James Sayre
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  CT angiography, MR angiography and rotational digital subtraction angiography for volumetric assessment of intracranial aneurysms. An experimental study.

Authors:  M Piotin; P Gailloud; L Bidaut; S Mandai; M Muster; J Moret; D A Rüfenacht
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Multimodal imaging in the elastase-induced aneurysm model in rabbits: a comparative study using serial DSA, MRA and CTA.

Authors:  A Doerfler; W Becker; I Wanke; S Goericke; N Oezkan; M Forsting
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-04

9.  Computational geometry for patient-specific reconstruction and meshing of blood vessels from MR and CT angiography.

Authors:  Luca Antiga; Bogdan Ene-Iordache; Andrea Remuzzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation using CTA and MRA. Correlation with DSA and intraoperative findings.

Authors:  C Kouskouras; A Charitanti; C Giavroglou; N Foroglou; P Selviaridis; V Kontopoulos; A S Dimitriadis
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  4 in total

1.  Intraobserver and interobserver variability in CT angiography and MR angiography measurements of the size of cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Hye Jeong Kim; Dae Young Yoon; Eun Soo Kim; Hyung Jin Lee; Hong Jun Jeon; Jong Young Lee; Byung-Moon Cho
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Semi-automatic measurements and description of the geometry of vascular tree based on Bézier spline curves: application to cerebral arteries.

Authors:  Jarosław Żyłkowski; Grzegorz Rosiak; Dominik Spinczyk
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 3.  Hemodynamics of Cerebral Aneurysms: Connecting Medical Imaging and Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Vitaliy L Rayz; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 11.324

4.  Analysis of Cerebral Aneurysm Wall Tension and Enhancement Using Finite Element Analysis and High-Resolution Vessel Wall Imaging.

Authors:  Adam E Galloy; Ashrita Raghuram; Marco A Nino; Alberto Varon Miller; Ryan Sabotin; Carlos Osorno-Cruz; Edgar A Samaniego; Suresh M L Raghavan; David Hasan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.