Literature DB >> 1880869

Standardized patient encounters. A method for teaching and evaluation.

M A Ainsworth1, L P Rogers, J F Markus, N K Dorsey, T A Blackwell, E R Petrusa.   

Abstract

The primary goal of medical education is to foster development of clinical competence in trainees at all levels. Variable clinical experience, inconsistent methods of instruction, and ambiguous evaluation criteria undermine this goal. Standardized patients, trained to consistently portray a wide variety of clinical cases, can help overcome many of these educational problems. This article describes the development and application of standardized patients throughout medical training at The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, in the freshman interviewing course, the second-year physical diagnosis course, third-year clerkships, a fourth-year final exercise, and residency training. Development of this program is discussed in the context of a broader literature in medical education, and investigation of variables affecting standardized patient and student performance is reported. Future directions for use of standardized patients in monitoring and promoting the development of clinical competence are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1880869     DOI: 10.1001/jama.266.10.1390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  20 in total

1.  Examination of standardized patient performance: accuracy and consistency of six standardized patients over time.

Authors:  Lori A H Erby; Debra L Roter; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-20

Review 2.  The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joseph Plaksin; Joseph Nicholson; Sarita Kundrod; Sondra Zabar; Adina Kalet; Lisa Altshuler
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Teaching resident physicians chronic disease management: simulating a 10-year longitudinal clinical experience with a standardized dementia patient and caregiver.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schlaudecker; Timothy J Lewis; Irene Moore; Harini Pallerla; Anna M Stecher; Nathan D Wiebracht; Gregg A Warshaw
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-09

4.  Didactic value of the clinical evaluation exercise. Missed opportunities.

Authors:  F J Kroboth; B H Hanusa; S C Parker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Assessing competence in clinical ethics: are we measuring the right behaviors.

Authors:  R M Arnold; L Forrow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Ethics, Cultural Competence, and the Changing Face of America.

Authors:  Terri Laws; Janice A Chilton
Journal:  Pastoral Psychol       Date:  2013-04-01

7.  Does psychological characteristic influence physicians' communication styles? Impact of physicians' locus of control on interviews with a cancer patient and a relative.

Authors:  Yves Libert; Isabelle Merckaert; Christine Reynaert; Nicole Delvaux; Serge Marchal; Anne-Marie Etienne; Jacques Boniver; Jean Klastersky; Pierre Scalliet; Jean-Louis Slachmuylder; Darius Razavi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect.

Authors:  Hans M Bosse; Martin Nickel; Sören Huwendiek; Jana Jünger; Jobst H Schultz; Christoph Nikendei
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Factors affecting the reliability of ratings of students' clinical skills in a medicine clerkship.

Authors:  J D Carline; D S Paauw; K W Thiede; P G Ramsey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Evaluation of resident performance in an outpatient internal medicine clinic using standardized patients.

Authors:  R P Day; M G Hewson; P Kindy; J Van Kirk
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.